Precast coping vs poured in place concrete for pool coping?
petermac18272
March 4, 2014 in Design Dilemma
Not sure which way to go, pros and cons?
Thank you for reporting this. Undo
PRO
Genesis Pools and Spas
Pro to precast: it is a strong material but limited in colors and finishes.
Con to precast: Sometimes the measurements they take are wrong and the coping doesn't end up looking professional.
Pro to poured in place: 2 options to the coping edge (bullnose or square edge). Many more color and finish options. If you do banding throughout the yard you can pour the same color to match everything.

We always install poured in place coping unless the customer wants Travertine or Limestone coping. I hope this helps. Here is a poured in place pool picture in Malibu, CA.

NOTE: if you install a salt system then precast is probably better. Salt eats away the cement in poured in place much faster and exposes the aggregates.
March 4, 2014 at 4:43pm   
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Awkward living room
Any design advice would be greatly appreciated! We...
Cathedral or slant ceiling?
We are in the process of building our new house. In...
Found this wooden piece on the street, wondering what to do with
It, foot stool, nightstand, any other creative ideas...
Crown Moldings Low Ceilings
We have a house built in 1950 with ceiling heights...
Furniture placement in living room!
Hi all! My husband and I have been working on lots...
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2014 Houzz Inc.
Houzz® The new way to design your home™