Houzz Tour: Mission District Row House

Hi There! I currently live in a 1920s cottage in Atlanta that I'll describe as "collected." I got into design via Landscape Architecture, which I studied at the University of Virginia. I've been writing about design online for quite a few years over at Hatch: The Design Public Blog.
Hi There! I currently live in a 1920s cottage in Atlanta that I'll describe... More »
Bookmark
Email
Embed
Lately we've been having quite the debate during Victorian Era Houzz Tours! The debate seems to concern how to adapt this sacred architecture to meet contemporary needs while keeping the spirit of the original era alive. In many cases, details had already been wiped out during prior renovations, or the architects had preserved these details but some readers were turned off by the modern furnishings used in the spaces. It's a very interesting conversation to continue, as we see the confluence of (a) The influence of the original house structure and history (b)The needs of the clients (c) Achieving goals of energy-efficiency and reduction of construction waste, and (d) The designers' visions for how to adapt these homes in an artful and respectful way.

This Mission District post-1906 earthquake row house is a great study. The architect, Christian Dauer, has a background in Historic Preservation and as a restoration craftsman, as well as a vast knowledge of how to re-adapt a home in an ecologically responsible and sustainable way. Here he has made the space livable and functional for the client. Special attention was given to preserving the facade and respecting the history of the home and neighborhood, addressing other additions that weren't working and adding to the space, providing good access to the outdoors literally and visually, and bringing in more natural light while providing ample privacy from homes that are only a few feet away. Furthermore, the spaces in the new addition not only utilize repurposed materials from the original site and addition, they also carry on the spirit of the Victorian era by incorporating lots of new hand-crafted elements. The home has joined the old with the new right down to its bones...and floors...and even the kitchen table!

Some of the pictures you'll see below feature spaces from the original house (the dining room), while others show rooms that are in the new addition (the kitchen). Without further ado, let's have architect Christian Dauer take us on the tour!

What was the condition of this house when you arrived on the scene? What were the client's needs in the renovation project?
The original house was largely a period piece—its front façade and main rooms date back to its original construction following the 1906 San Francisco
earthquake/fire. Over the years it suffered from neglect, and had accrued a number of rear additions including a tiny third story garret that projected two feet past the side property line (presumably making it easier to borrow a cup of sugar from a neighbor).

While livable at a very basic level, the house really needed a full remodel and expansion in order to provide flexibility for our client's present and future needs. They tasked us with a complete yet restrained redesign: reorganizing sleeping, cooking, and work spaces, and increasing natural light, while retaining significant historical details that gave the house its distinct character. The result is a home that achieves comfort on many levels through the juxtaposition of modern and historic design elements.

The more formal living and dining rooms have been restored with targeted modern touches. The new home offices (originally two tiny dark bedrooms) are
linked via a shared skylit pass-through with sliding glass pocket doors. The kitchen and bath/laundry highlight the modern/historic dialogue as open multi-use spaces featuring vintage centerpieces. The 3rd story bedrooms and bath are consistently modern, with strategically composed windows that maintain privacy from the home’s dense exterior urban context.

Please tell us a little bit about the neighborhood and surrounding context of the property.
The immediate block is one of the most cosmopolitan thoroughfares in San Francisco’s Mission District. Residences share the sidewalk with destination restaurants, a bakery and an ice creamery with ever-present queues, and a coffee/video parlor. One of the best locally owned grocery stores in the city is
across the street, and Dolores Park is a half block away. Basically, the house is smack dab in the center of all that the neighborhood has to offer.

How did you meld the original part of the house with the new additions?
This house is a product and prime example of the rapid redevelopment of San Francisco after the 1906 earthquake. Because of this association, the Italianate
front façade has historic landmark status and was deemed “sacred”. We deferred to the original by composing the new 3rd story addition in a form that did not mimic the original, painting it a dark receding color, and setting it back 15 feet from the primary façade. These efforts are in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, and are a good example of how modern design vocabulary can support the authenticity of an expanded/restored historic structure.

The rear addition/remodel had far fewer constraints. Its northern orientation allowed for large horizontally banded windows and doors that flood the interior
with balanced natural light. The third floor addition is much more prominent at the rear, but its orientation and massing minimize shading of the rear yard. Its views are maintained by railings made from woven wire loop fencing typically found in front of Victorian cottage gardens.

How did you manage to bring so much natural light into the interior?
Natural light was a primary concern, informing all design decisions and providing creative opportunities. We replaced every window at the front, introduced 3-
1/2 huge multi-light windows at the rear, and added 5 skylights at the rooftop.

My favorite is the oculus of natural light in the dining room—a room otherwise absent of direct sources. The original plaster ceiling medallion was long gone,
so we took advantage of its absence by creating a new centerpiece—a spherical reflective fixture hangs by a thin cable from the top of a 13’ tall, cylindrical
skylight shaft, and reflects copious natural light throughout the space. Because of urban light pollution it even works at night.

What are some of the ways you improved the home's energy efficiency and where were you able to use repurposed materials?
We made every effort possible within the budget to create an efficiently designed and sustainably constructed house. The building envelope was tightened by new double glazed windows, doors, skylights, and maximized R-value formaldehyde-free insulation, the 95% efficiency forced air furnace
and instantaneous water heater minimize natural gas consumption, and a 3.0 kW rooftop photovoltaic solar array zero’s-out the client’s annual metered electric power usage. The vast majority of wood framing from the original basement was diverted from the landfill and re-milled for use as 3rd story roof soffit cladding, as well as in the fabrication of the new custom-crafted kitchen table.

I'm so impressed you were able to reuse so many materials, right down to the beautiful handmade kitchen table! Speaking of materials, I love the detail of the spindles on the railing - what inspired that?
I usually give my clients a housewarming gift that has a direct connection with the project; often it’s some sort of cool light fixture, doorknobs, etc… In this instance, I made 200 turned maple balusters for their two new stairways. I fabricated these with a hand-operated German threading jig that turns ordinary wood dowels into spiral cut, threaded rods. We painted them to highlight their shadow lines as well as to contrast the naturally finished douglas fir rails. In series, the balusters resemble both a finely turned piece of woodwork and a raw piece of building hardware.

What a wonderful way to continue the tradition of incorporating handmade wood details to this style of home. I can't think of a more perfect housewarming gift!

Let's move through the house and out the doors to the backyard. Having outdoor space in the city is such a luxury. Please tell us a bit about the various outdoor spaces your design added to the site. What was the
backyard like before?

Just outside the kitchen is the rear deck, which connects the interior to the rear yard, garden and new service areas below. The deck is actually a vestige of
the old house that was retained because of budget and zoning reasons. We upgraded it with the new wire loop railing, which is repeated around the new
third story roof area outside the master bedroom. This upper outdoor space will eventually define a lush private roof garden.

Please tell us a bit about your career path and how you wound up where you are today.
My path to becoming an architect started at a fairly young age, inspired by a teacher and mentor during high school, then led me through various
opportunities in New York, New England, Denmark, Georgia and Texas, eventually landing in California in 1995. I graduated college with a BFA in
Historic Preservation, after which I worked for two years as a restoration craftsman at the Lyndhurst Estate Museum—a property of the National Trust
for Historic Preservation. I then earned my MArch degree from the University of Texas at Austin, and worked for firms in New York, Berkeley, and San
Francisco that specialized in academic/civic facilities, commercial adaptive rehabilitation, restaurant, lighting, and custom residential design. In 1996 I
opened a commissioned furniture fabrication studio, became licensed in 2000 and immediately thereafter established ChrDAUER Architects…ten years ago.
At present the office has residential projects throughout the Bay Area, Montana, Connecticut and Massachusetts.

It was so refreshing to see how every part of your background influenced this thoughtful design, from the respect you show the neighborhood to imagining you handcrafting 200 spindles yourself. It's a great example of how to respect history, correct mistakes made during renovations of the past, fill a home with natural light, keep construction waste down with clever and beautiful repurposing and use modern methods for maximum energy efficiency.
The Italianate façade with new 3rd story addition above: All historic siding and detailing were restored and painted with a common color in deference to the typical treatment for houses of this era and scale (“Painted Ladies” are largely
a myth).
Private Comment
The living room was restored to be a bright and crisply appointed space for entertaining and music. The original Douglas fir flooring was refinished, complimented by the pale green painted trim.
Private Comment
A new 13’ high oculus skylight with spherical chrome
pendant fixture diffuses natural light throughout the
room. The original faux-grained built-ins and trim were restored to reinstate the dining room’s prominence.
Private Comment
The kitchen addition connects with the green space in the backyard, and floods the room with natural light through large horizontally banded, counter height windows.
Formaldehyde-free painted cabinetry with countertops made of resin coated
recycled paper are easily maintained and environmentally sound.
Private Comment
The kitchen table, crafted by a local artisan using salvaged redwood and Douglas fir from the building site, is the center of daily family meals. The 1940’s Magic Chef double oven range—inherited from the client’s family—was restored and incorporated seamlessly into its new modern environment, continuing the modern/historic dialogue.
Private Comment
The light-filled rooms of the main floor balance modern
design and historic context. All original doors were painted a warm, satin black/brown, providing a distinctive complement to the restored woodwork of the dining room, as well as the painted trim throughout the rest of the living areas.
Private Comment
A suite of two twin home office/guest rooms are linked by a common skylit pass-through with glass paneled pocket doors. This carrel serves as spill-over work space and brings natural light into the adjoining rooms.
Private Comment
Handmade by the architect, the threaded wood balusters offer contrast to the natural finish of the Douglas fir stair railing.
Private Comment
The 2nd and 3rd story additions at the rear of the house share a common paint scheme, but differ in siding treatments to accentuate their respective volumes and reduce the presence of the back of the building. The third floor roof and lower
kitchen decks are bordered by redwood railings with looped wire panels, which will serve as future trellises for flowering wisteria and jasmine.
Private Comment
The delft blue 3rd story addition with unadorned picture
windows provides a backdrop to the historic scrollwork
of the primary facade. Redwood from the original house
was re-purposed at the addition’s roof soffits and ceilings in select rooms, providing visual warmth and minimizing construction waste.
Private Comment
The composition of the large north-facing master bedroom window system provides visual access to the out-of-doors while screening views from adjacent neighbors.
Private Comment
The 3rd floor bedrooms’ clear-finished Douglas fir doors, deep-hued accent walls, and bright modular carpeting add warmth, comfort, and simplicity to the sleeping
spaces.
Private Comment
The main floor bath and laundry features the original
clawfoot tub in the midst of modern finishes and conveniences.
Private Comment

Comments

I live outside London, our house was built in 1901. I love my house, we moved in 1986 and we did a lot of renovations, like double glazed windows and installing a central heating. We also had spindels on the staircase as there was a lot of space between them and no good for a baby/todler as I was expecting. We add picture rails, and dado rails, as the people before had done a massacre to the house. We also renewed the roof, and instead of red tiles as our neighbourgs where installing, we decided to follow the house "tradition" and replaced the slate tiles for slate tiles. My daughter now 23 is begging me NO to sell the house, as "this is where I was born - pls mummy do not sell it" so I am stuck here... we need to renovate it, so one of these days when we get the lottery and a good tea of builders... I will get inspired. I will send you photos soon.
But my point is .that although of course we could have new elements, lighting, furniture,e tc.. these houses need love and respect, after all you would hate your 90 year old grandma go out wearing a miniskirt - this is what I mean..... you have to find a balance rather than be drastic.... treat it with respect and the house will give you a warm home to live in.
I am posting here 3 photos - 2 are during a heavy snowfall last winter and the other my dining room-kitchen. My dinning room now is creamy/terracotta. I will send you some pictures soon if you are interested.
regards
Maria Dixon
20 months ago ·
The original house was probably filled with colored wallpapers. I find the white altogether too stark, especially for a Victorian. A little color, judiciously chosen, would still brighten the interiors while recalling the house's orgins.
20 months ago ·
lanehouse says:
No, don't like this house at all. In my opinion there is no flow from the historic to the modern (a table of recycled wood is hardly enough connection and the harsh white walls don't help). I actually don't like the modern part at all, I've seen much nicer modern homes that hugely reference historic homes, and they're not even attached to one! The kitchen look anemic and doesn't do the beautiful Magic Chef justice. All in all, just so disappointed with this one. Sorry.
20 months ago ·
The addition on the back is modern. The architecture of the front of the house was well-preserved. There are not many pictures of the front interiors in the story above. The modern addition allowed the architect to bathe the interior in light. Check out the dining room to see the original architectural details.
20 months ago ·
karen1974 says:
Very interesting interview Becky. I love the overall look and the way he blended the past with the future. Beautiful!
20 months ago ·
How much is this and is it on the market? Thanks and sorry if it's in there...I don't see it though.
20 months ago ·
Becky, has the photograph of the living room been photoshopped? The piano looks unusually long (I can't count the keys, but more than 88!), and the sofa also looks extraordinarily long.

I think the lack of detail is disappointing. One of the great practical achievements of Palladian architecture was the realization that the eye finds it pleasing and restful to have large blank spaces broken up by mouldings and details. Contemporary architecture often tries to make a virtue of what is really a necessity: limiting details because of cost. That seems to be the case here, and it makes the house remodel look cheap. This is most obvious in the staircase. Usually the bannister is the single most distinctive and elaborate design feature in an old house. What is shown here is really -- I am sorry to say it -- appalling. If I bought this house I would immediately change that.
20 months ago ·
Thanks Karen! I really enjoyed taking this virtual tour with Christian Dauer, and learning about how his background influenced his approach to the project.

Hi Curious - I don't think it's on the market; this was a renovation completed with existing owners who planned on staying, as far as I know.

Nora, I didn't take the photos - I assume it could have been a lens that was able to show the whole width of a narrow room (I am NOT a photography expert, though it doesn't look photoshopped to me). The banister was a design choice; the architect hand made every single spindle as a housewarming gift to the owners, which I find amazing. I've toured quite a few Palladian villas as I spent a semester in the Veneto and one of my professors owned the Villa Rotunda, and I was always more struck by the perfection of the proportions than by the mouldings.
20 months ago ·
kittycat says:
the wood floors are the only thing i like. those endless white walls cancel out the warmth of the wood. everything feels so cold and clinical, especially the kitchen, which should be the heart of the house. only a surgeon would feel comfortable in there.
20 months ago ·
This house was most likely built sometime between 1885-1895, not after 1906. Those classic rectangular bay windows seemed to have fallen out of fashion around the mid 1890's. A house built in 1906 would have gone for a more modern look. If the house burned in 1906 (it didn’t because this part of the Mission didn’t burn) and it was rebuilt, it is unlikely it would have been built to match the original house. How could an architect with a background in Historic Preservation not have the capacity to know the age of the structures he is working on ??? In the haste to rebuild San Francisco after 1906, much detail was left out of the structures and we were left with generic, boring, repetitive architecture that covers the majority of old San Francisco. What a shame, imagine what San Francisco would have looked like had the earthquake not destroyed the fantastic gold-rush and Victorian commercial structures !!!
20 months ago ·
Amazing how many people can suddenly become 'experts' on subjects they clearly know nothing about. 'whatdoyouwant' is certain the house predates 1906, but a 30 second search in the SF Planning Department database dates the house to 1908. Let's elevate the level of discourse a little higher than just, "i just don't like the color". The architect created very subtle elements of surprise through light and color. The renovation is well executed by respecting the historic street facade, yet allowing the house to respond with an open contemporary plan in the rear yard. Funny how SF can be so progressive politically, but still be riding stage coaches when it comes to architecture.
20 months ago ·
liz says:
Sorry folks, but I would've loved to live in this house. It looks amazing. Different people have different tastes and that's fine. If you don't like it then don't buy this house or have your house the way you want it. Highbrow has it place but everyone deserves to have their own aesthetics.
20 months ago ·
says:
What? I love the design. The white feels restful and opens up the house, and variety and innovation is healthy! Most important, if the design suits the homeowners, then it is a successful design.
20 months ago ·
Yikes! Things are heating up around here! I just wanted to clarify what I have now dubbed "Keyboard Gate" with a quote from the architect:

"Yes, some of the narrow rooms required a wide angle lens so things at the periphery get distorted, the piano is real is in tune and has all its keys, sofa also exists, is very comfortable and is 7 feet long."

Bill, Liz, and Karen, maybe we should all become roommates and move in this house together :)
20 months ago ·
I completely disagree with some of the comments above. I think that the house is beautiful. We live in the 21st century and people (like me) who like modern design have the right to modernize their homes (yes- even if they are "historic homes"!).
The natural light around the house is amazing. I would move to this house tomorrow morning.

20 months ago ·
sowsley says:
I disagree with the monochromatic white exterior paint scheme. Study the black and white exterior house photos of the era. You will see contrasting trim colors quite often, and will also see multi-colored paint schemes as well in the color design books of the era. I think the monochromatic paint scheme is a post war affectation - how can I cheaply paint this ornate hulk of a home. Double that sentiment if it was a rental. When Victorians left fashion, so did attempts to dress them up with paint. The same thing happened with Bungalows from the 30's. I will readily agree that the elborate color schemes of today's "painted ladies" is not original, but monocrhromatic? How '50's and '60's!
20 months ago ·
billbloomfield: Don't believe everything you read. I could show you a long list of houses that were built in 1906 according to the planning department that show up on 1880s or earlier maps. Many records were lost in the 1906 earthquake, and date of construction is one of them. Furthermore, subsoil investigations behind houses of similar architecture has always yielded artifacts (glass, ceramic plateware, ect.) dating to the 1880s..
20 months ago ·
What a beautiful house! I love what the architect did to bring in more light. It feels so open and bright. It's creative and livable designs like this that ensure these old beautiful homes survive for generations and don't end up abandoned and eventually torn down. Loved the interview!
20 months ago ·
whatdoyouwant: Yes, the house MAY have been built earlier than 1906, but we don't really KNOW do we ? So the next time you go criticizing a design professional's "capacity", maybe you should do your own "subsoil investigations" before blessing us with your dissertation.
20 months ago ·
Nice interview. Thanks for your perspectives.

The question as to the original date of the structure is interesting, although I wonder if the difference of the few years possible delta (pre/post 1906) is even relevant to the interview, or the design approach the architect and owners chose. Either way, I would appreciate more detailed information, if available, as indeed, official SF records from that era can often be sketchy, at best.

I believe the addition / renovation was very sensitively executed without being predictable or overly acquiescent to the past. The abundance of crisp white simply offers a background to cleanly contrast, and thereby enhance, the clear finished wood and other well-placed colorful accents. It also allows for an unfettered appreciation of the nuanced palette of shifting natural light reflection and shadow. Setting the 3rd story back from the street, while implementing contrasting materials, successfully allows the original facade to maintain its character. The architect was able to create bright, inviting spaces in a building type that can very often be oppressively dark.

As for the commentators who can't seem to offer reflections or criticism without being overtly rude, perhaps your "insight" will be more appreciated at:
http://fans.wwe.com/go/network/blogs
20 months ago ·
sillyme says:
I think the house looks great! I love that it is painted white on the exterior. The shadows of the woodwork bring out all details and decoration one needs. Beautiful job.
20 months ago ·
For those of you who were interested in the history of the site and want to know more about the dates, here are some clarifications from the architect regarding the documentation as well as discoveries made on the site during construction:

According to the following document - sourced from UC Berkeley's Earth Science and Map Library, as well as the SF Public Library's History Room Sanborn Maps - this block did indeed burn and the existing house did not exist on that site prior to 1906:  "Map of San Francisco, California Showing limits of the Burned Area destroyed by fire of April 18th-21st 1906, following the Earthquake of April 18th, 1906, Prepared from the best information available in the office of the Chief Engineer, Pacific Division, U.S. Army May 1906." 
 

Perhaps its builder had extra brackets and windows left over from previous jobs. History is often a Mystery...

As for site findings,  upon excavation the house  was found partially resting on brick foundations of an earlier, much larger building as well as a 20" culvert pipe....... historic geological maps show a stream bed meandering the present neighborhood.
20 months ago ·
Hey, Becky, Can I join in on the roommate idea? I think the house is stunning and the architect did such a great job of marrying the old with the new. It's also wonderful to hear all of the ways he eliminated construction waste and was able to reuse so many materials instead of shipping them off to the landfill. If only everyone thought so carefully about these things we could reduce so much waste.
20 months ago ·
jefland says:
I love the melding of a victorian townhouse and clean lines....It's so sleek AND vintage at the same time. See, it IS possible to combine of the period details on historic structures and do it in a way that pleases the minimalist/modern eye. Modernism doesn't always have to be about new and shiny.
20 months ago ·
Mona says:
I am a huge fan of Victorian homes as we lived in one growing up....maybe I am no expert on Victorian verses Contemporary, but I know what I like and I think that the architect and designers did a brilliant job integrating the two concepts in this gorgeous home. Of course, that is just my RESPECTFUL opinion.
20 months ago ·
alijwitt says:
I LOVED this renovation. As someone who lived in the Mission for awhile in the late '90's, I saw what it was like to live in houses that had not been renovated. Yes, they were beautiful in their time, but owners and landlords failed to take care of many of them and these houses were dying, which was such a shame. I would have loved to live in a house renovated like this one. The architect kept the gorgeous wood floors, highlighted beautiful original features by making them stand out against the simple modern addition and made the house energy efficient. They house is both light and private, two very important elements I found very hard to come by in the Mission - many of the houses, while they were clearly beautiful in the past, had become dingy drafty and dark. I think the white walls give the house a light, airy feeling and highlight the original detail. The architect has combined new and old in such a way that the house feels both elegant and warm to me and is not an insult to the origins of the house, but a way to save the house and bring it into the present. I love it!
20 months ago ·
sammycat says:
To all the haters: I think this house is beautiful! If you want your interior to look like 1911 instead of 2011 then that is your preference. But some of us want to live in the here and now. I think it's a good idea to modernize old homes instead of tearing them down or leaving them to be an eyesore of rot and decay.
6 months ago ·

News From Our Partners

Follow us on: