Create an ideabook for your next remodeling project!
Browse more than 1,500,000 photos from top designers and save your favorites
| Like it? Save it to your Ideabook »
|
| Pairing clean architectural lines with well-edited furniture is the greatest key. Though modern style has gone through its phases (glass brick, anyone?), distinct elements such as strong lines and simple materials have always been its hallmark. |
| Like it? Save it to your Ideabook »
|
| Go with modern furniture that has already withstood the test of time. Who can ever see this Eames chair and ottoman becoming passé? Often one focal piece is all it takes to make a room. |
| Like it? Save it to your Ideabook »
|
| Similarly, this sleek dark kitchen finish pairs well with the lighter flooring and the various materials throughout. Keeping materials mixed and honoring materials that have been fresh and modern through the years creates a unique look for YOUR version of modern. |
| Like it? Save it to your Ideabook »
|
| Take older, beloved furniture and arrange it in a more modern way. You don't have to have all of the latest modern furniture to suggest a modern space; in fact, acquiring all of the newest material of right now is exactly what will date your space. The sparseness and fresh arrangement of the furniture here pairs beautifully with the simple architecture and window detailing. |
| Like it? Save it to your Ideabook »
|
| In the bedroom, simplicity equally reigns. Neutrals create a quiet and consistent palette throughout. The window walls are framed with an understated light hue. And one signature piece overhead gives the space added individuality. |
@ellie48: Regarding your comment "...does not have to mean boring/traditional."
Traditional architecture/design is "boring"? You find nothing of interest (i.e. not boring) created over the course of 2000+ years? Nothing created throughout the entire history of the western world's architecture/design is interesting? Greek Classical, Roman Classical, Medieval, Gothic, Romanesque, Renaissance (and each of their varied sub-types)... Plus, Colonial, Romantic, Victorian and Arts n Crafts (and all the varied subtypes in each) occurring in the US, all the way up to F.L. Wright's Prairie Style... BORING?
WOW! Either you're not knowledgeable about what the term "traditional" means with respect to architecture and interior design... or, you have an extremely limited (and/or indoctrinated) opinion. Which, if it's the latter... so be it. However, I can and would be happy to recommend a number of excellent books on the subject matter.
Regarding the Post itself...
Essentially, what this post advocates is to select "modernist" period/style pieces for placement in minimalist contemporary style spaces. Sounds okay to me... I'm a fan of furniture in the "modernist" style... but, whether I do or don't like this type of approach is really not important.
What I want to address, however, is the continued misuse of terminology with respect to "modern", "modernism", and "contemporary"... their correct use and reference within a well-define lexicon. These terms are consistently misused by most people, including those "in the industry", which is frustrating to read as someone who has made great efforts to understand such particulars.
1. What many, if not most, people (including the professionals) call "modern", is either an example of "Modernism" as a style or contemporary in expression. For instance... the Eames chair noted in the Post: that's a period piece of furniture in the "modernist" style. Now, the "Modernism" is a term which includes varied sub-types as well, just as the Victorian or Romantic period styles which preceded it.
But, what most people don't understand, is "Modernism" occurred within a period of time, just as another other period prior. The period style of "Modernism" is no longer "modern". I realize this may be confusing... and I realize this may even bother some... but, it's a fact. Pick up any book on architecture which outlines the numerous historical periods and you'll find "Modernism". And, you'll find the newer, more "modern" styles, which have been documented (so far) to have occurred since the period style of "Modernism" ended. You'll find "Post-Modernism" for instance. What I find illuminating about "Post-Modernism" when discussing these matters, is it's a documented period style having occurred after "Modernism", yet it's expression/character is marked by use of "classical" architectural element(s)... at times tongue-in-cheek and too often laughable because the architect who designed the "Post Modernist" building was a "Modernist" who has no capabilities to properly design a traditional element, because the "Modernist" movement purposefully eschewed such studies.
2. Buildings designed today which purposefully turn their backs on "traditional" precedents (the architect and/or critic commonly states the expression is "Modernist") are actually either "contemporary", OR they are Neo-"Modernism"... just as a building which borrows heavily from classical precedents might called Neo-Classical. What's amusing about this contemporary architects who claim their work to be "Modernist" are usually the first to deride buildings designed based on precedent buildings of any "traditional" expression as being "Historicism"... or copying. Yet, contemporary architects who successfully design a building in the "Modernist" period style are doing the same... they are looking to precedent. Now, as someone who practices "traditional" architecture I of c
If anyone wants to question, comment, challenge my 1/2 comment, above, please feel free to contact me... I'd be happy to try to clarify, offer books for reference, etc.
Best, Chad
Phew, er Chad, even as an architect - I know what you are getting at, but is this really the place for it? Relax mate.
You seem to be searching for a forum for expressing your views. Please feel free to make your own ideabook and contribute positively to the Houzz community.
From what I just checked into three dictionaries, the word modern is one of the synonyms for the word contemporary, and vice versa. But you are saying that in architectural and interior design world, these two words have two very different definitions, and represent different periods and eras.
I agree with you, I don’t think all traditional is boring and unworthy, hardly so. But some of the very hideous creations (I won’t even call them styles) I certainly would eliminate them when time comes to renovate my house. See, it really comes down to our subjective tastes. Here is the now very fashionable word “vintage”, what period does it belong to, the same as Eames, or anything you find from your grandma’s garage that you can clean it up real well?
As for Eames Lounge Chair and Ottoman, whether mid-century period or modern, I simply call it classic. And at a price tag of $4500 and end, I call it a classic with a contemporary/modern charge.
Chad- overboard. Dont take one comment that may or be not be completely literally as fuel to lecture and slightly insult.