Recharge Mower by Recharge Mower! By recharge Bob!

***"I've got to say, it's fantastic"***
Well, I've got to say, "SPAMtastic".
I found it to have an infomercial scent. But I'm intrigued by several comments: ***"no moving parts"***
Huh?? (Maybe it uses a laser to slice the grass!)
***"It runs on rechargeable batteries, so there are no emissions."***
Oh, there are emmissions. You just have to go down to the coal burning utility generator complex to observe them.
***"After the battery is charged, I simply plug it in and let it charge overnight."***
And then after the second charge, you just plug it in again and let it charge overnight again?? Sounds like all you do is keep this thing plugged in all the time.
***"Because there's no motor"***
Huh? once again?? No motor? OK, I'm convinced there has to be a laser to cut the grass.
***"I'm really in love with this machine"***
Good, good. Psychologists across the land are setting out to define, study, and treat, this new disorder. Already, they are calling it "Mechanophilia". And (as expected), politicians and lawyers are drafting legislation to make it legal for a person to marry their lawn mower (consenting adults only).

Isn't it amazing how we're supposed to find credibility in someone that just registers today and their first post is SPAM! Where's the Worx GT thread. That must have had 50 people attest to it. They all registered the same days as their "testimony".

Looks like a plastic POS. Like a Little Rascal with an electric weed eater attached and a chintzy bagger.

By no motor they mean no engine. The company web site clearly states it has three 900 watt motors. (1 drive and 2 deck motors.
Anyway it's just an electric rider. No big secret here. My neighbor has a John Deere electric that is similar in design and size that mows great. They have been around since the 70s. The problem I have is the goofy spam-like infomercial post.

It only cuts grass with the rear bagger installed. That would be a deal breaker for me since the garbage haulers dont take clippings in my parts.

"It only cuts grass with the rear bagger installed."

Sounds like an opportunity to override another safety switch...

***"By no motor they mean no engine."***
Right you are sir! Even though "we" seem to be comfortable in substituting the term "motor" for the term "engine" in colloquial speech, the terms are not "equivalent". Can anybody help me out here?

mownie said: ...the terms are not "equivalent". Can anybody help me out here?

I've read discussions about this and could be that Wikipedia could shed more light. But the gist was an engine was said to be a self-producing power source...as long as you had some type of liquid, solid or gaseous fuel supply. And a motor required a separate power source, such as a hydraulic or pneumatic pump unit, or electric power generating plant to make it operate. Of course this is kind of playing with semantics and it was pointed out that Detroit auto engineers and auto periodical writers routinely interchanged the two terms. So there was no resolution in that particular discussion.

Hi rechargebob !

Wow... this thing looks really well built. I love the copious amounts of plastic - ensuring that it wont rust when tossed into your local land fills or junkyard.

I guess i could connect an electric log splitter to the electric PTO - correct ?

That front bumper guard looks pretty stout as well.

Its always nice to see another product from China - that pleases me to no end too!!

I wonder if I could get a plow blade for it.

Do you think I could pull a cart full of firewood ?

I think Ive found a replacement for my 444 ingersoll...

With Billy Mays gone, this mower doesn't have a chance IMO.

***" an engine was said to be a self-producing power source...as long as you had some type of liquid, solid or gaseous fuel supply. And a motor required a separate power source, such as a hydraulic or pneumatic pump unit, or electric power generating plant to make it operate."***
larso, you are the first contestant to answer correctly. And of course, it is absolutely playing with semantics. After all, you don't think I believe all the "Motor Oil" in the stores is for electric motors, do you? The only time I ever saw "Engine lube oil" actually packaged that way was back in the 1970s when I worked for International Harvester. IHC always had their own branded "motor oil" (and other lubricants and antifreeze). In 1975, IHC "reworked and revamped" their "house brand" engine lube oil family to the "low ash" formula that was purported to help gasoline engines meet the ever more stringent EPA emissions standards. IHC discontinued using "paper with metal end" quart and gallon containers. The new "Engine Lube Oil" was packed in all metal (steel) quart and gallon "cans", and for the first time ever, IHC offered a "five gallon can" of oil. Oh, while IHC was making an attempt to be "PC" about "engine oil", The company division I was affiliated with was known as "International Harvester, MOTOR Truck Division". Go figure!

about all this thing needs is solar recharge panels and it'd qualify for a federal rebate or tax break.

Hey recharge Bob, you going to take this crap from these yoyos? I thought so! You are giving us guys with the name Bob a bad reputation. I'll keep my Dixon 44" ZTR mower, thank you!