Software
Houzz Logo Print
dreamgarden_gw

The Sub-prime Trump Card: Standing Up To The Banks

18 years ago

*Disclaimer: I do not approve of those who irresponsibly applied for no doc, zero down, adjustable rate mortgages, nor do I approve of banks, etc. being bailed out by the TAXPAYERS for their shoddy lending practices.

The Sub-prime Trump Card

Standing Up To The Banks

By Ellen Brown

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”

Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Treasury Secretary Albert Gallatin (1802)

27/06/08 "ICH"-- - Jefferson had it right. More than 1.5 million homeowners are expected to enter foreclosure this year, and about half of them are expected to have their homes repossessed. If the dire consequences Jefferson warned of 200 years ago have been slow in coming, it is because they have been concealed by what Jerome a Paris calls the Anglo Disease �" “the highly unequal economy whereby the rich and the financial sector . . . capture most of the income but hide it by providing cheap debt to the middle classes so that they can continue to spend.” He calls “finance” the “cannibalistic” sector in today’s economy. Writing in The European Tribune this month, he states:

“[O]ne of the more attractive features of the financial world, for its promoters, is its ability to concentrate huge fortunes in a small number of hands, and promote this as a good thing (these people are said to be creating wealth, rather than capturing it). . . . [O]f course, the reality is that such wealth concentration is created by squeezing the rest, as is obvious in the stagnation of incomes for most in the middle and lower rungs of society. This is not so much wealth creation as wealth redistribution, from the many to the few. But what has made this unequality . . . tolerable is that the financial world itself was able to provide a convenient smokescreen, in the form of cheap debt, provided in abundance to all. The wealthy used it to grab real assets in funny money, and the rest were kindly allowed to keep on spending by tapping their future income rather than their insufficient current one; in a nutshell, the debt bubble hid the class warfare waged by the rich against everybody else.”1

Now the debt bubble is bursting, with the anticipated real estate crash, banking crisis, foreclosures, and inevitable recession. “The income capture mechanisms set up during the bubble have not been reversed, so the pain is falling disproportionately on the poorest,” writes Jerome a Paris. Meanwhile, finance is being bailed out. What’s to be done? “[T]he financiers . . . will say that more ‘reform’ and ‘deregulation’ and tax cuts are needed,” he says, but “maybe it’s time to stop listening to what is highly self-interested drivel, and take back what they grabbed: it’s not theirs.”

Good idea, but how? The financiers own the media, and their massively funded lobbies control Congress. How can we the people get enough clout to take on the giant financial and corporate giants? What can we do that will make politicians sit up and take notice?

How about swarming the courts? New case law indicates that a majority of the 750,000 homeowners expected to lose their homes this year could have a valid defense to foreclosure. As much as $2 trillion in real estate may be vulnerable to this defense, providing a very big stick for a lobby of motivated debtors. Mobilizing that group, in turn, could light a fire under the investors in mortgage-backed securities -- the pension funds, money market funds and insurance companies holding these “orphan” mortgages. These investors also wield a very big stick, in the form of major law firms on retainer. When the embattled banks demand a bailout because they are “too big to fail,” the taxpayers can respond, “You have already failed. It is time to try something new.”

The Legal Trump Card: Make Them Produce the Note"

A basic principle of contract law is that a plaintiff suing on a written contract must produce the signed contract proving he is entitled to relief. If there is no signed mortgage note or recorded assignment, foreclosure is barred. The defendant must normally raise this defense, and most defaulting homeowners, unaware of legal procedure and concerned about the expense of hiring an attorney, just let their homes go uncontested. But when the plaintiffs bringing subprime foreclosure actions have been challenged, in most cases they haven’t been able to produce the notes.

Why not? It appears to be more than just sloppy paperwork. The banks that originally entered into these risky subprime arrangements generally did so because they had no intention of holding the loans on their books. The mortgages were immediately sliced and diced, bundled up as mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and sold off to investors. Loan originators sold the mortgages to financial institutions or other banks, which then sold the rights to the monthly mortgage payment income to investors, while transferring the responsibility to collect these payments to specialized mortgage servicing companies. The result has been to slice up the mortgage contract, with no party really having ownership of the original paperwork. When foreclosure has been initiated, the servicer or trustee acting as plaintiff now has trouble proving that it originated the mortgage or owned the loan. In order for a second bank or financial institution to have standing to bring a foreclosure lawsuit in court, it must have been assigned the mortgage; and with the collapse of the housing market, many of the subprime lenders have gone out of business, making it impossible to contact the originating mortgage company. Other paperwork has just been lost in the shuffle.2

Why weren’t the mortgage notes assigned to the MBS holders when they were first sold?....................

A link that might be useful:

www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20190.htm

Comments (5)

  • 18 years ago
    last modified: 11 years ago

    It would be nice for a lot of people facing foreclosure if the mortgage company would have lost the paperwork, but you and I both know that there aren't too many cases where that will have happened. I've signed several mortgages over the years, and it takes about 30 minutes to sign all the different papers. Yet the authors of this article would lead us to believe these documents so painstakingly executed wind up at the bottom of bird cages, or just tossed out like last Sunday's newspaper? I doubt it.

  • 18 years ago
    last modified: 11 years ago

    Uh, actually ky114, not being able to produce an Assignment of Note/Mortgage is a problem. In many cases, an Assignment was never actually prepared. In other cases, the Assignment & the original documents have been separated from each other. Some judges are trying to crack down on these sloppy foreclosure practices but it's still happening.

    Usually though, even if they don't have the Assignment immediately...using this as a defense against foreclosure is just a stall tactic. Eventually, they'll get the paperwork together & be back attcha.

    /tricia

  • 18 years ago
    last modified: 11 years ago

    So, how does what you said and what I said differ? Bottom line: They've got the paperwork somewhere, so it ain't gonna work.

  • 18 years ago
    last modified: 11 years ago

    Is it any wonder why judges in several states are forcing banks and other lending providers to prove they own the properties in question?

    Wall Street girds for battle on accounting rules
    July 02, 2008

    NEW YORK/WASHINGTON (Reuters)"In the middle of a credit crisis that only seems to get worse, Wall Street is mustering its lobbying clout to delay tougher accounting rules that would force banks to add $5 trillion to their balance sheets.

    For years, accounting standards allowed U.S. banks to keep certain loans, such as those linked to risky subprime mortgages, in off-balance sheet vehicles. But members of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which sets U.S. accounting rules, have become convinced that approach hid the true risks banks faced from these vehicles, and that standards must be fundamentally altered.

    Under FASB's current thinking, analysts estimate financial institutions could be forced to book $5 trillion, which would most likely include troubled loans.

    That would skew capital ratios, force banks to stash away cash to offset their risks, and hit their liquidity at the worst possible time.

    "These drastic measures are being rushed and could single-handedly erase the efforts of policymakers to provide stability and restore liquidity to our markets," said Brendan Reilly, senior vice president with the Commercial Mortgage Securities Assn.

    "Any changes must be delayed until all options and consequences are carefully examined," he said.

    However, under direction of the Securities and Exchange Commission, FASB must revamp the accounting standard, known as FAS 140, by 2009. It could release a proposal on the new rule in the next few months.

  • 18 years ago
    last modified: 11 years ago

    I have zero sympathy for those in the mortgage industry who grew so excited to speed up their volume flow that they failed to button up the detailed legal paperwork.

    If a borrower misplaced a bill and was thus late on a payment, the industry would penalize them without apology.

    "He who lives by the sword" and all that....

    Da rules is da rules... they cut both ways!

    Cheers,
    Dave Donhoff
    Leverage Planner