lazy, you remind me of the apologists the tobacco industry used back when it became apparent that using tobacco products caused cancer.

Kimmq, Poetier had no facts. You need proven scientific facts reviewed by peers to come up with the truth. "Probable human carcinogen" with no facts is worthless. The tobacco industry was fighting facts and lost. No connection to this article at all.

Please read:

https://corporateeurope.org/food-and-agriculture/2017/10/setting-record-straight-false-accusations-dr-c-portier-work-glyphosate

I know this is an old topic but there's some mudslinging here, or rather lack of mud since your million dollar remote control Deere tractor just disconnected itself for an update and the service guy has to wait for your bank loan to go through before he can pull out the snow plow.

We're talking about human lives and health here. Cancer, GI and immune issues, asthma, obesity, and so on. Pointing fingers is kind of neither here nor there. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, well, that can be said on either side. Like, literally forcing everyone to eat nothing but the same organic MREs would not be freedom, but I don't really think that forcing people to grow all GMO feed is freedom either.

Think back a few years when Dow Chemical. DuPont, Occidental, and others all told us that dumping their waste products in the soil would do no harm and then DuPont's Love Cannel exploded with barrels of waste emerging from the ground and peop0le living there having all kinds of exotic diseases. Think back to why we kow have the Environmental Protection Agency and why in many places they have clean up processes going that will be there for another 50 to 75 years in an attempt to clean the water.

We have been lied to by people that should know better for fewer reasons than applying a n herbicide.