Software
Houzz Logo Print
monkeybutt8

Crimson queen or red dragon

19 years ago

Would someone help me with a seemlingly impossible decision? I am trying to decide between the crimson queen and the red dragon. All the information I seem to find makes them sound really similar. Except, one says weeping and the other says spreading. Could someone tell me the differences, the pros and the cons of each? the area where the tree will be planted is on the north side of the house, anywhere from full shade to full sun.

I appreciate your patience and kindness and any advice.

Thank you,

Kent

Comments (14)

  • 19 years ago

    They are both weeping red JMs. The spreading part depends on whether or not they are staked up or not.

    The leaf shape is only very slightly different and it would be difficult to tell the difference until close up, and the habit is quite similar. 'Red dragon' may hold the color better into late summer than 'crimson queen', but this could be dependent more on environmental conditions than the genetics of the cultivar.

    I've heard conflicting information about which one is more vigorous and/or which one obtains a greater height. Some say that 'red dragon' is slightly smaller than 'crimson queen'. 'Red dragon' being about 7 foot high/wide, 'crimson queen' being around 10 foot high/wide (note that this assumes a similar amount of staking and growth for 25 years or so). However, I've also read that 'red dragon' is more vigorous and larger than 'crimson queen'.

    In reality there is so little different between the two, all but a few of us collectors would be able to tell them apart (I say this but I honestly don't know if I can right now).

    But, if I had to pick just one [I will soon have both :)], I would go with the 'red dragon' because it is newer and supposedly better at holding its color in summer.

  • 19 years ago

    I may be biased, because I have two, but I prefer 'Red Dragon'. It holds its red color better and takes sun well, which may be advantageous in your climate. The leaves of 'Crimson Queen' look a bit more 'lacy' to me which is nice but they green up a bit by mid to late summer, so 'red dragon' gets my vote. Dan
    {{gwi:58014}}

  • 19 years ago

    Both are excellent choices, so you could hardly go wrong with either :-)

    Ultimate height is a factor of where the graft is located and training, but all things being equal, Red Dragon will tend towards a more upright growth habit while Crimson Queen will remain more of a broadly spreading, umbrella-shaped mound. CQ tends to grow somewhat more slowly as well and on mature specimens, is definitely much wider than tall. Specimen trees at our nursery are a good 10-12' wide but less than 5 feet tall. You should definitely consider placement and room to spread, as pruning back to fit a smaller space is not an ideal solution.

    Both retain their color quite well in summer (at least a PNW summer), with RD having a bit of an edge. And both are quite heat tolerant.

    Crimson Queen has received the RHS Award of Garden Merit and is considered one of the best of the red dissectums. It's a very classy plant.

  • 19 years ago

    Everything said above is true both nice JM's... I also have both I find the RD to be a much better holder of red color HERE in Il as Dan stated...the CC will green out much more here ...I also think the RD is a bit less likely to leaf burn or just not as much HERE, at least that was the case with mine last summer... BUT most any JM will suffer leaf tip burn in summers like the last. Since CC's are relativly cheap and available almost anywhere ( I bought two end of season grafted CC's at Kmart for $8 ea and both have thrived and done well)...so i'd get both...I feel they are a bit more differnt from each other than Matt feels ( agreeing with Dan) the CC is a bit more dissected and seems to be a tiny bit lighter red and both worth having in there own right ... David

  • 19 years ago

    I have both Crimson Queen and Red Dragon in my yard. The CQ I've had for about 15 years, the RD about three years. In my yard, CQ seems to grow faster, although my tree is only about 3-1/2' tall and it's at least 18 years old. Mine is wider than it is tall. The RD seems to keep its red color better in the heat of summer. Mine has only grown about 6-10" in three years, more in width than height. If I could buy comparable plants for the same price, I would probably choose Red Dragon. But Crimson Queen is easier to find and probably less expensive since it's been around a while, so I wouldn't hesitate to buy one if the price and/or size and form were better.

  • 19 years ago

    Thank you very much for your advice, I appreciate all of your comments and the beautiful picture!

  • 19 years ago

    To be honest, most of the red dissectums are very similar in appearance, particularly the individual leaves. They do differ in form, eventual height, tolerance to heat and color retention. I also have a Garnet, which is the fastest growing red dissectum I have seen. I really like the color, a brighter red than most, but it greens up by late June. My Garnet has grown taller in 3 years than than my 18-year-old Crimson Queen.

    I have heard very good reports about Tamukeyama, but don't have one in my yard. It is supposed to be very heat tolerant and retain its color well. Inabe shidare is another red dissectum that gets high marks, and it tends to grow taller and less broad than most varieties.

  • 5 years ago

    Please check the comparison article of these two maples: Japanese Maple Red Dragon vs Crimson Queen: 4 Things to Consider


    monkeybutt8 thanked Igor Viznyy
  • 5 years ago

    That‘a a helpful article.


    It raises the obvious question, are there any Japanese maples with the size and habit of the CQ but the richer colors of the RD. I want to find something to replace a rhododendron that was getting too much sun (and don’t want to lose the vinca growing beneath it). 6 feet high is fine, about what the ailing rhody is, but 10 feet is too tall.

  • 5 years ago

    You could consider either Tamukeyama or Inaba Shidare. Both have very deeply colored foliage. Ultimate height will be dependent on the graft location. And if you do not wish the tree to get taller than a certain height, then avoid staking to encourage upward growth. The natural habit of any of the dissectums is a low, weeping, mounding shrub.

  • 5 years ago

    I hadn’t even considered the need for staking. I got my current red spider for in front of the house, and it’s growing tall with no staking and no problem, I’m thinking of just pruning the top at around 8 feet.


    I don’t really know anything about the differences between the vertical JM trees and the wide shrubs.

  • 5 years ago

    Unless staked to achieve more verticality, weepers weep :-) They never get significantly taller as all new growth is pretty much horizontal. It just layers on top of itself. And virtually all the dissectums or laceleafs - like Crimson Queen or Red Dragon - are weepers.

    Red Spider is a linearlobum or strap leaved, upright growing form. Or should be :-) There seems to be some confusion in the trade. Some places are selling a dissectum under this name but that is incorrect. That plant is actually Beni Kumo No Su, which translates to 'red spider web', but it is NOT the same tree!

  • 5 years ago

    Wow.


    My crimson queen is green leafed by the end of summer, in spring it is very purplish.

Sponsored