Software
Houzz Logo Print
mtnrdredux_gw

Crosspost - Interviewing Architects (Sochi?)

13 years ago

Hi Sochi,

You asked me to update you on the interviewing architects question (cross post in "Building a Home".

We spent Friday and Saturday interviewing architects. We had chosen three who met our original criteria, ie having built at least 10 houses in our location (which is a location that poses challenges).

The first firm (partnership, really) we interviewed was my favorite going in. They have a somewhat unique style that we like, and, despite being pretty well known and published, a reputation for being cost conscious.They also showed us the type of documents that prepare and the detail was impressive. Two issues: they'd either have to take a ferry or fly to the site, and they cannot take on any new work for at least 6 months.

The second firm (again a partnership), distinguished itself by being very well prepared. They no longer live in the area but they did for many years and have done many many projects. They had actually obtained a copy of the survey and marked up 4 different site plan ideas. They had done a ton of due diligence. Two issues: they are also very far from the site, and the finished projects they showed us were not our style. A little too McMansiony, albeit very nice. I feel as though we would really need to lead the design process to get the vibe we want, and what do we know about design?

The third firm is a local resident who has done several dozen homes and lived there for decades. His style, like ours, is very very simple and casual, even on very large very pricey projects. He showed us some of his work and we loved it. In particular we saw one barn conversion that had a lot of the creative, sort of utilitarian like style details we want for our beach house. And it was a project he had done for the owners 20 years before, and they just hired him again last year to put a new kitchen in the mainhouse (good sign). He correctly summed up the local vibe as the confluence of country and ocean.
Issues: He is a sole practitioner, which may be a risk, and he hand draws everything (we had that last time and I was really hoping for some Sketch up at least!).

We really felt worn out after spending a few hours with each of them, but honestly all of them were very impressive and we were glad we went through the process.

Now all we need to do is close (a new whacky wrinkle in the deed needs to be fixed).

Did you chose your architect yet, Sochi?

Comments (5)

  • 13 years ago

    The type of ownership of the architectural business (sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation) really matters little. What matters a lot are: 1) the person you will be working directly with and who will be working/leading the work on your project; 2) the relationship between you and s/he; 3) the experience and ability to produce that which you desire.

    From your description, it sounds like that may be the third description.

    Good luck on your project!

  • 13 years ago

    Thanks, Virgil. Yes, I agree, the third architect is our choice.

  • 13 years ago

    Thanks for this mtn, very interesting. I bet it was exhausting interviewing them all. From what you describe it certainly sounds like option 3 is the best fit for your project.

    We have chosen our architect, we meet with him again tomorrow in fact. I have seen a couple of houses he has done, and I'm confident in the choice. We are building in another province, which complicates things considerably. We really needed someone who excels in modern design, has managed work in this area and has good contacts with local builders. It is tough finding good builders in that area, particularly a builder with experience building modern structures, and this architect has a couple of good ones he has worked with in the past. This was critical for us.

    Tomorrow is the first "fun" meeting with him, we'll go over our critical needs list, desirable wants, some of our inspiration pics, etc.

    Good luck as you move forward with the project, I'm really looking forward to following your progress!

  • 13 years ago

    Make sure the sole practitioner is licensed. A license is not required to design a house but you want to be sure he is being honest with you.

    The biggest risk of a sole practitioner is that he may get too busy or catch the flu but if you budget additional design time you should be OK. On the other hand your house project won't get handed off to an inexperienced draftsman.

    Having the principal draw by hand means slower document preparation time, slower revision time and it would be at the hourly rate of a principal but if the total fee is limited or the hourly rate is lower than for the larger firms it should all work out.

    SketchUp is not anything like a CAD drafting program. A CAD program would require a year of training and cost thousands of dollars. An experienced architect should be able to use SketchUp after a couple of hours of YouTube tutorials assuming he owns a computer (if not, I think you should hire another architect).

  • 13 years ago

    Thanks for your feedback, Renovator. I think the pluses here do outweigh the potential negatives.

    Yes, I know Sketchup is pretty simple (that's why I said I hoped they 'at least' used Sketchup). I taught myself how to use the layperson's version in an evening (a long one!). I think I may brush up, lol!