I love it! Pretty table, very reasonable, highly functional . . . What more could you ask for?

That is a pretty big difference in size, and more importantly, in height. How high are the arms on the pieces by which it will serve as an end table?

You could cut out a template from some cardboard boxes to check out the size of the top, simply putting that on top of the existing table. Then perhaps you could stack some books to raise the height of the existing table, and get a sense of what it would be like.

Part of what matters besides the arm height of the furniture is also how large your room is. The piece could look stuffed into the space, or could serve to fill a rather open spot.

Let us know what you decide.

My first thought was nesting tables. Overstock.com has this set for $58

{{!gwi}}

I like that table! I'm wanting one in those same dimensions (no larger than 36" dia) to go in my breakfast area between 2 comfy chairs. May I inquire as to where you found it? Thanks!

DD2 has a large (at least 30" dia) table at the end of her sofa. It's taller than the arms, but some are. Doesn't make them wrong - that's an old "rule."

I couldn't find her table online, but the (local) store where it was purchased has another one on their site by same manufacturer - 35" round by 29" high - and we've seen it at the store.

Her table is a reproduction based on a wine tasting table. It actually tilts.

Here is a link that might be useful: her table

The idea of the table not being too high as compared to the arms of the seating is not an 'old rule' - it is about practicality. If someone is sitting in the seat and wants to put a glass down on the table beside them, if the table is a lot higher than the seating it can be awkward to do so. Especially if you have bulkier arms on the seating that you are already navigating.

The visual aspect is something else - sometimes it looks okay, sometimes it looks fine. But I don't think there is a rule to be broken! LOL

We'll have to agree to disagree. It's an old rule in that it's almost always been stated (decorating magazine, online reference material, TV shows) in the past that tables should be even or just below.

Just like bedside tables, things have changed (which is a good thing). But it really boils down to personal preference.

Here is an inspiration pic for ya if the height works.

The reason for the rule of a table not being taller than the arm of the chair it sits next to is...comfort. It's hard to put your glass on a table when you are sitting and Have to reach up....but I like the look.
I have 2 drop leaf end tables...one antique dating from about 1880....the other Kling cherry from the 1950's. Both make small eating tables with the leaves uop....35 to 40 by 24 or so...the old one is 29 inches high the new one2 4.
Would something like that work for you? Small with the leaves down...bigger when you put them up.
Linda C

I LOVE that table!!!! Can you put up a link as to where to find it?

I have a similar table that I use by my sofa - it is a very, very slightly higher than my couch arm. So slight that it isn't an issue. I like the round table helps break-up all the squareness of my couch, chairs, etc.

I agree with the thinking about a table can be too high to be comfortable - but I think in the right circumstances a higher table can also work, such as in Allison's daughter's room. No problems because she has a coffee table for drinks, etc.

Depending on the sofa, if you are going to be reaching for items on the table alot - it might or might not work. I agree with trying something along that size and see how it "feels".

tina

Found table at County Door, thanks for your input.
http://www.countrydoor.com