Software
Houzz Logo Print
jerijensunsetz24

The "Atmore 'Lamarque'"

11 years ago

In 1848, three Atmore brothers came to California, looking for gold. Gold didn't make them rich, but they did well with freight-hauling and other businesses, and even ran a boarding house in Placerville.

In 1869, they left the Sierra Foothills for Ventura County. One brother settled where I live, in Camarillo. One in Ojai (where they still run cattle), and one -- Richard -- in Santa Paula, where he and his wife, Ambrosia, built a beautiful white Queen Anne home.

They brought a rose with them, from Placerville, and planted it at their Santa Paula home, where the rose still grows.

They were kind enough to share cuttings with us. And we have shared the "Atmore 'Lamarque'" with others. It's growing in the Santa Barbara Mission "Huerta Garden" and mine is FINALLY in the ground.



Comments (17)

  • 11 years ago

    Wonderful story and beautiful rose. Oh, why do I live in zone 5 :( ?

  • 11 years ago

    I love roses with a history behind them - and she's beautiful too!

  • 11 years ago

    I've always loved history ... so roses with a tale attached grab me every time.


  • 11 years ago

    I've got to find a place for 'Lamarque'. Beautiful. However, from something Dr. Manners mentioned on the JH/WRCT thread, it sounds like some clones are more authentic than others and the "Atmore" clone is regarded as one that is authentic? Are there clones being sold as 'Lamarque' that probably aren't? (Which begs the question: "If they aren't, then what are they?")

  • 11 years ago

    Jo -- NOTHING could make me happier than seeing how well this beauty is growing for you.
    I knew it was meant for you to have it.

    Catspa -- I don't remember that remark from Dr. Manners, but I'll ask him about it.

    I think there has been some question as to whether the rose usually sold as 'Lamarque' is in fact 'Lamarque,' . . .

    . . . or whether the rose that Vintage sold as "Thomasville Lamarque" is the "real" 'Lamarque'.

    If that was what you were referring to -- I cannot speak to that question.

    What I KNOW is that the rose we call "Atmore 'Lamarque'" has grown in my area since 1869 -- and that it matches the rose usually sold as 'Lamarque'.

    S0 ... I guess what I am saying is that if the rose usually sold as 'Lamarque' is NOT 'Lamarque' -- it must be some other rose that was known prior to 1869.

  • 11 years ago

    Jeri, here is what Dr. Manners said:

    "As we find the time and labor to do it, it would be super easy to determine with DNA if JH is an offspring of (or otherwise very closely related to) Lamarque. We have Kim's "Atmore Lamarque" which seems to have pretty good documentation for being the real 'Lamarque'."

  • 11 years ago
    last modified: 11 years ago

    And, great, another potential mystery...well, there are at least two named varieties of the same lineage ('Lamarque' and 'Jaune Desprez'), why not a few more?

  • 11 years ago

    Jeri, or Kim, to my untutored eye, the rose in my garden that Cass told me was 'Lamarque' looks like the Atmore one - here is a pic - what do you think? As I explained in another thread, mine is a rooted cutting of one from my neighbor's garden. There is another bush of it in that garden, which is huge. That house was owned by the same family from at least 1920 until our current neighbors moved in about 10 years ago. The garden has other huge roses which look as though they did not get any care for decades (and they certainly do not from the current owners). I spoke with the elderly man when he was moving out 10 years ago - he said he grew up there, and he remembered my DH's grandfather's fancy large old car (which would have been in the early 1930s). He said his parents' were the ones who planted the roses.

    So, I am guessing my rose is a clone of one which grew in that garden for almost 90 years.

    Jackie


  • 11 years ago

    So beautiful! Love the story and the rose!

  • 11 years ago

    Jacquie -- I'm sure Cass was correct, and your rose is also 'Lamarque.'
    There are a good number of very old plants of 'Lamarque' -- demonstrating, I think, the toughness of this delicate-looking plant.

    Look back to this conversation:
    http://forums.gardenweb.com/discussions/1620004/flores-street-house-eater-san-antonio

    to see the "Flores St. HouseEater," a long-lived wonder in San Antonio, TX. (Gone, now, alas -- but certainly not forgotten.)

  • 11 years ago

    Jeri, the leaves on your 'Lamarque' remind me of the leaves of a peach tree; long, narrow, pointed and somewhat droopy (although 'droopy' isn't really an elegant enough word, my brain cells aren't supplying me with a better adjective). Lovely!

    Virginia

  • 11 years ago

    I love hearing the history behind a rose. It is such a prettty rose too.

  • 11 years ago

    I thought of 'pendulous', but isn't 'elegantly drooping' quite good? Beautiful rose.

  • 11 years ago

    Pensile, maybe? Whatever appellation you go with, it is a gracile beauty.

  • 11 years ago

    'Pendulous' and 'pensile' are both good, and so I guess my inelegant wording got the point across, even if it doesn't do justice to the 'gracile beauty' (to borrow a phrase) of the rose pictured.

    Thanks,

    Virginia

  • 11 years ago

    Yes. The foliage is long, narrow, and rather soft. Most importantly, it is clean as a whistle, where I garden.

0