#1 looks like a polystachya, clandestina, or macrophylla. Do leaves blush in high light?

#2 most likely archboldiana

#3 could be heuschkeliana

the first leaf looks like my clandestina. and i love her.

If #3's leaves are pubescent (fuzzy), it is NOT heuschkeliana, but could be brevialata, incurvula, DS-70, or any number of small leaved pubescent hoya. Do you remember the color of the blooms?

aurorawa, the leaves do not blush. I think you may be correct about #2 being archboldiana, but is there any way that it could be magalaster?. #3 leaves aren't fuzzy and I think it may be heuschkeliana. Thier names would be on the list above. I probably will not be able to ID #1 until it blooms. Thanks everyone for your IDs.

Oh I would kill for a large leaf variety like the three you mentioned first, aurorawa!

It is not megalaster. Megalaster's leaves look like this:

I have to maintain my punk rock persona. ;)

Hi, Cindy. Number 3 looks exactly like my nummaralioides, I'm positive that must be it.

gloria

yes, number three looks like nummy.

I am not convinced that it is nummularoides.

1. She said the leaves are not pubescent

2. If that is a recent photo, it should not have peduncles, which it does. Aside from numm. yellow, every single numm. I have owned, as well as people I have talked to that own it, numm. is one of the only hoyas that does not hold its peduncles, it sheds them after blooming, which is in the fall.

Ah, OK. I missed the non-pubescent part of the description and while my numm has lost more than half of its peduncles, it puts new ones out now and then that last about a month. There were six in a row on one stem really close together and I got all excited and then they dropped off. It bloomed well last fall though so maybe they'll come back. Sorry I couldn't be of help.

gloria