NO. there it is again - got to be in blocks of 3!!! this is pretty good. its an example of NOT being floor to ceiling. i would go with narrower vertical posts between the windows and then 2 thicker support posts, with a group of 3 windows in-between. i wonder if this thicker horizontal beam is a support beam so that you can have the upper window gong up to the ceiling?? if we did that we would have to be smart about locating the horiz beam so that its not at eye level!
NO TOO MODERN. how about this type of window (frameless) in sets of 3??? the unique thing about this pic is that there is no door, so these windows dont move at all and you have so much clear air inbetween the set of 3! you would have to have some kind of working door at one end, that would still match well with the rest of the windows.
how about these colored window frames. they are thin enough and it could have a lower and upper section like this. bottom part would be 6.5-7' tall and then the lateral frame, and then another 2-3' upper section. the color is nice and kind of natural. again do this in a set of 3, with white drywall support posts. problem may be that it appears this is custom and not readily available.
NO, JUST A RANDO IDEA ONLY ONE THING here: the long tall vertical window at center-left. Rectangular one! look how beautiful it looks with the narrow wood frame together with the drywall inset giving some nice dimension to window/wall. How about have 3-window set with thin wood frames like this and then each set framed/surrounded with the inset drywall (about 4-6") deep. and this allows us to have a space between the window top and 12-18" to the ceiling of
really nice balance of few grid, but just enough of them to make it interesting!! it makes it so you could have a pretty wide span of this window type without it becoming bland
Q