Another 2

more :) Think West Aust natives for these ones, they are obviously different to the rest.

native babies?

2nd last. Theres one more but I dont have photo of yet :/, seems a bit diff to most, mostly like this one, but hard to tell cos its pretty beaten up.

Cycads can be a bit difficult to ID, especially when they're small and not coning. But I'd say they're all Cycas species except for the third one which looks like a Macrozamia. If it's from WA, there's 3 Macrozamias there, I'd suspect yours was M. fraseri.

The first and second Cycas look the same, but can't see anything distinctive that suggests a particular species to me. The fourth photo looks like Cycas angulata. The last photo looks like Cycas revoluta, which is one of the most commonly sold ones and not native to Australia. Cycas has the most species of any of the cycad groups, so there's a lot to go through, and with some of the differences being very small identification is difficult.