Software
Houzz Logo Print
greenmtn_gw

Cookware -When is disc ok versus tri-ply up sides

19 years ago

I think I saw somewhere that having tri-ply (?) extend all the way up the sides (All-Clad, Calphalon Tri-Ply) was great for sauce pans and stock pots but not as necessary on shallow pans like saute or frying pans. Is this right or am I even more confused?

I am looking at Calphalon SS Tri-Ply and Calphalon Simply SS (disk on bottom). I thought maybe I could splurge on the Tri-Ply for some items and save by getting the Simply Calphalon for other items. What advice can you give this new cook? Thanks.

Comments (12)

  • 19 years ago

    Funny, I always thought of it the other way.

    Disk on bottom makes sense for things that do not have to be surrounded by heat; such as when making sauces. It ok for the heat to be concentrated just on the bottom.

    For searing, pan frying, etc., you want the entire skillet to heat up. So I prefer the fully clad for those items.

    There may be technical reasons otherwise, but I feel a lot of this depends on your cooking style. For instance, with skillets I do a lot of shaking and flipping of the pan, rather than stirring with a spoon or spatula. So for me it's especially important that the whole pan be hot. But I stir sauces and the like, so disc-bottoms are fine for pots and saucepans.

  • 19 years ago

    I have not had a good experience with pans that have disc bottoms. The rim on the inside of the pan corresponding to where the disc meets the bottom of the sides often burns. The more evenly a pot or pan heats, the happier I am. Go for the fully clad, not the disc-bottom, even on saucepans and stockpots, unless all you use them for is boiling water.

  • 19 years ago

    I'm trying to envison what you're saying. None of my disc bottom pans have a rim on the inside. The sidewalls meld smoothly into the bottom. Basically, they are standard one-piece pans to which the disc has been attached.

    Nor have I ever had one burn at all, let alone along the line you're describing.

    Maybe you're just working at too high a heat?

  • 19 years ago

    I thought I was a bit unclear in that description. I will try again. The inside of the pans I tried is smooth, as you describe. However, because the disk on the bottom stops at the edge of the bottom--on the outside of the pan--there is a heat differential between the bottom and the sides. Yes, I do use fairly high heat when I saute, by the way. The pans were purchased at a "big box store." A line of Sitram, if I recall correctly. Oh, and I use a gas range. I gave the pans away.

  • 19 years ago

    Curioser and curioser. Sounds like we have similar cooking styles. I cook on gas (hate electric stoves, in fact) too. But even with relatively cheap disc-on cookware (i.e., WearEver) I haven't had that problem.

    With stainless it's easy to overheat, particularly if you're used to other types of cookware. Even when sauteeing in the disc-bottom pans I only work at medium heat; whereas I would have worked at high heat in other pans.

    Anyway, I don't think there's a right or wrong in this. As I said above, it really boils down (whoops. sorry about that) to your own cooking style and comfort level.

  • 19 years ago

    Interesting I find I like the fully clad up the sides for things like soups etc and the disc works fine for saute. My saute pan or a fry pan is never full to touching the sides like sauce pans.

  • 19 years ago

    Again, it gets down to cooking style. When I'm sauteeing, I'm shaking, and twisting, and flipping the skillet, and the food touches all parts of it. So I want it evenly heated, and pretty hot all over.

    When I'm using pots, on the other hand, the food is usually liquid based. I'm either boiling, or poaching, or stewing in them; or making sauces. Something like that. So all I need is the bottom heat, cuz once the liquid is up to temperature it just has to be maintained.

  • 19 years ago

    Thanks for the input. I'm going to try and get fully clad wherever possible (price wise). I did buy one Simply Calphalon with the disc bottom. It is the small no-stick fry pan and I bought it for $14.99 at TJ Maxx. Figured I would give it a try for eggs and such.

  • 19 years ago

    From my research, tri ply heats evenly but takes longer to heat up, while disc cookware heats quickly but only on the bottom. Makes sense, since my set is all tri ply except the steamer pot, where quick heating makes better sense than even heating. I have Le Gourmet Chef cookware, which seems to be the closest in design and quality to All Clad at a fraction of the price. I did in fact look at Calphalon but liked LGC better. You can buy online or go to their site and look for a store. My 12-piece set was on sale at the store (in New Jersey) but not online, so definitely research it.

  • 19 years ago

    Incidentally, eGullet has a long, quite technical explanation of heat capacity and pot/pan composition. I would trust this gentleman for technical conclusions. I will bop over there to see if I can find the name of the thread. And, despite everything he says, the poster who says "it depends on your cooking style" is right.
    Also, I haven't tried the brand myself, but I have heard that some folks find the Henckel's brand that is similar to All-Clad, but with different handles. They look weird, but are reputed to be quite comfortable.

  • 19 years ago

    Sorry, it's the Cooking for Engineers forum.
    http://www.cookingforengineers.com/article.php?id=120&title=Common+Materials+of+Cookware

    Here is a link that might be useful: Cooking for Engineers

  • 19 years ago

    The EGullet article is at the link below. More detail than you ever wanted.

    Also there is a diagram here of the relative heat conductivity of disk bottom vs straight gauge for reducing:
    http://forums.egullet.org/index.php?showtopic=25718&st=207

    Here is a link that might be useful: eGullet Stovetop Cookware