Software
Houzz Logo Print
jeff_bowers492

Beginning the process

11 years ago

After months of searching for a lot, we've finally found one we're happy with and is reasonably priced. It's in a new development built around a small creek. It's one of the larger lots, but it was cheaper because it doesn't directly border the creek, part of the lot is a catch basin, and there's a sewer easement with an access hole on the property. Negatives, true, but we should still have access to the creek, and there won't be anyone building behind us. Plus it has more of a forestry feel than most of this area (desert). The area around the creek is owned by the city, and continues on to a city park about 100 feet down stream. Overall we're very happy with it, and we should close in a month.

We've been interviewing builders, and it has been instructive. They're all quite different, but one common thread is that they all seem to know right off just what we need. Even though we tell them that we've looked at plans for a couple of years without much success, they think they have just the plan for us in mind. In their heads we can take a plan they've already done, make a few tweaks and we'll be all set. In general, they've been pretty negative about us working with an architect. Not that they won't do it, but they see it as an unnecessary expense.

In fact, one guy recommended that we use him as our intermediary in working with their in-house architect because architects are prone to flights of fancy, and are likely to give you only seven out of ten things you want from them.

One of the builders was completely different. He invited us out to his house (which was gorgeous), and showed us all the things he'd done and the green features of the house. He thought we should use an architect to get what we wanted, but when we talked budget, it was obvious that he's at a different level. He kept repeating, "That's quite a challenge." He builds in a much pricier area. Nice guy, though. He'll probably be happy to answer questions for us and give us some suggestions.

So, after interviewing 4 builders, 2 are out of the running. We're going to meet with the architects these builders usually work with, and then depending on the result, we might interview a few more. So far it's been an enjoyable and educational experience for me. My wife doesn't enjoy the interview part of the process that much, but she's been a very good sport. Hopefully we can move on to the more enjoyable part of planning and designing soon.

Comments (7)

  • 11 years ago

    Sounds like there are a lot of limitations and red tape with the lot. You need to re-examine your budget to deal with all of that. ''A challenge'' as the builder termed it, is probably an understatement.

    It sounds as though the guy you eliminated for being too pricy may be the more realistic and above board builder rather than the lowballers who gave you artificially low beginning prices with low allowances that you'll always exceed. He's telling you the truth. Working with an independent architect is always better than using an uncredentialed ''designer'' tied to a builder. That's the fox guarding the henhouse.

  • 11 years ago

    Thanks, hollysprings. I understand your concern, but there is a real difference with the pricey builder. He builds in Park City (ski resort, Sundance Film Festival) and we're building in Lehi (farming community, rodeo). Plus his homes are very custom high-end homes, and we're not aiming that high.

    I'm concerned too about using an architect attached to a builder. Of the two we're interviewing, one is a "captive" architect, and the other is independent -- the builder just uses him for their plans and modifications. I see both pros and cons there. On the one hand, the builder and architect are used to working together, but on the other, they have a financial relationship much more important than my relationship with them. We will need to be careful.

  • 11 years ago

    Good architects cost money but they don't have to be prohibitively expensive. You've spoken with builders, maybe take a moment and talk to some architects that you have researched that do the kind of job you are looking to do (a way of saying don't choose the architect who does the multimillion dollar faux Tuscan villas).

    When we started our process a couple years ago (currently in the roofing stage) the first architect we spoke with told us that our budget was very low for what we wanted. Of course we didn't believe him. But guess what? Turns out he was right on.

    I could write for days about the process. But I wont.

    Moral of the story - some people will tell you what you want to hear. You need to be informed. We became informed along the way. It has been an expensive process.

    Good luck!

  • 11 years ago

    i have to ask this question---what are you looking for in a plan that is difficult to find?
    i've been interested in homebuilding for 35 years and the main problems i've seen with architects/home builders is a lack of communication between them
    we had a walk through after our foundation was poured, our builder went over every window, door opening (inside and out) every outlet and switch directions the cabinet doors and interior and exterior doors opened...... more details than you can ever imagine spent an 8 hour day on this--because he "doesn't trust architects much" and sure enough there were things encountered that were "fixed" in this walk through i don't think most builders go to this much trouble and i don't think most architects are "bad" either......

  • 11 years ago

    okokok: We've had three main difficulties in looking for plans. First, we need a wheelchair accessible main floor guest suite. Second, we have large family gatherings frequently, so we need a kitchen that can accommodate up to 6 cooking at the same time, and then we need to seat up to 30 comfortably, with enough room to serve them buffet style. Plus we want main floor storage for all those tables and chairs, so we're not hauling them up from the basement every time. And third, we've got a large list of activities that need to be planned for either in their own spaces or combined together.

    Kids computers/tv/video games
    Adults computers
    Watching movies/tv/sports
    Role-playing and board games
    Craft room
    Music practice & instrument storage area
    Library/reading retreat

    We just haven't been able to find plans that come very close.

  • 11 years ago

    i am thinking you are correct, an architect could be in order

  • 11 years ago

    It seems there's a universal dislike of architects among builders in this area. We have interviewed several in depth, talked to several others less formally, and not a single one thinks that working with an architect is a good idea. The common complaints are

    They're too expensive.
    They don't respond in a timely manner.
    They do what they want, not what the client wants.
    They don't know how to design a house for a specific budget.
    The plans they provide aren't any better than what you could get from just telling a draftsman what you want.

    I do like an architect's process better. The builders ask, "Which plan of mine can we alter to do what you want?" The home designers ask, "What rooms do you want, and how big do you want them?" and the architects say, "Tell me about your family and how you live." The question for me is, will the architect's process actually result in a better plan? Will it be better enough to justify the higher price?

    Given the amount of problems that people point out here on the forum with floor plans, even architect designed plans, I wonder if the best bet isn't just to post here and keep refining the plan until all the kinks are worked out.