Need a better photo of leaves to narrow ID. It is not nabawanensis, though. Flowers and leaves don't match nabawanensis.

It is also another unresolved name given by the man who constantly re-names:

If you read his description of nabawanensis in Fraterna, it will make little sense to you, especially if you know and are rather fluent in Botanical Latin.

Here is what was "published", and right off the bat, I am going to disagree with the corollas being described as glabrous. Sure, they arent as pubescent as lacunosa, but they are far from glabrous (smooth):

Thanks aurorawa. Here are some other picks

Is this by any chance the Acuta Hendersoni I got from you? Maybe I mixed up the I D tag?

The flowers make me think of pottsii, but the elongated leaves look a little more aldrichii or rigida. I think they're all in the same complex...

Denise in Omaha

acuta var. Hendersonii has lots of splashing on the leaves. It does resemble an acuta/verticillata, both in leaf and flower.

Aha, I think you nailed it for me. Thanks!

i had an ailing Verticillata that I took cuttings of. This must be one of them which is why there was no ID tag. Once it took root I kept it under T5 lights so I'm thrilled it bloomed.