Software
Houzz Logo Print
deannatoby

Burning bush, is it really invasive?

I had a Burning Bush in NH, but not here. I didn't plant the one in NH. I was surprised when I learned that it was invasive. It surprised me because I never seemed to see them unless they were planted in a yard. Same here in Maine now. The only burning bushes I see are in yards. None by the side of the road, none deep in the woods (as I drive), none in the meadows I pass by. I've talked to other people who have also never seen them outside of gardens. I have no plans to plant one, as I'm actually not that fond of them, but it has been a curiosity. Have any of you experienced its invasiveness? If it is invasive, where does it invade?

Comments (13)

  • 8 years ago

    In PA and they are not invasive here. At least none of the ones I have.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked functionthenlook
  • 8 years ago

    I had them in my yard when I bought the place, I think they seeded from there to the edge of the woods in back of my backyard. I don't think anyone planted them there. I removed my bushes but still pull up seeds that come up in my back yard. i find them to be prolific self-seeders in my south of Boston yard.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked asarum
  • 8 years ago
    last modified: 8 years ago

    Euonymus alatus is extremely invasive here in the Hudson Valley/Catskills. I planted one at the edge of my woods and years later they are now all along the woodland stream downhill from my house. I realized just how many there were one autumn when I took a walk and the whole area was lit up red!

    I haven't seen any collateral damage from them though. Stream still runs. I weedwhack all the seedlings around the original bush (more like a small tree, unpruned). It's lovely.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked susanzone5 (NY)
  • 8 years ago
    last modified: 8 years ago

    Burning bushes that have clearly gone wild are seen here in woods that we drive past. I like them, but was scared off by the thought that they would threaten the well being of my lilacs (which at that time I had 6 or 8 planted) as well as the fact that burning bush berries are said to be poisonous. However my lilacs did not do well and I am down to only two survivors. I never did buy or plant a burning bush although at one point I considered it, but neighbors have them scattered over the landscape, and I'm sure they will find their way here. I have made peace with the idea, and if the bb arrive, I shall cut down any bb that appear in the close vicinity of my two lilacs or in my perennial beds at ground level. No bb can survive on my mowed lawns, and if they invade my woods, they cannot pose a threat to my trees. I really love the looks of the burning bush (or any other species with flashy red/pink/orange foliage for that matter) so if they arrive on my property I will not be entirely unhappy, nor will I wage war against them as I did with the English sparrows. I have come to terms with the burning bush!

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked spedigrees z4VT
  • 8 years ago

    How most invasive plants work, at least in our part of the world, is they occupy empty spaces before the natives have a chance to. They do *not* usually overwhelm already established native plants. A large part of that is that the established natives they would have to overwhelm are trees. So a mature forest with a closed canopy allows very few invasives in. if something happens to disrupt the canopy, like someone building a driveway, that is where the invasives will establish instead of early succession natives.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked mad_gallica (z5 Eastern NY)
  • 8 years ago
    last modified: 8 years ago

    IME I think that they also may outcompete the herbaceous plants that would normally grow in these situations since untrimmed they tend to be densely rooted and branched so the herbaceous plants that might grow there don't. Where I've seen these growing along the woods edges, there isn't typically any herbaceous undergrowth whereas there is a fair amount of it in other wooded areas. In my neck of the woods, everything is old farmland with second growth woods.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked NHBabs z4b-5a NH
  • 8 years ago

    By me, they are growing where only poison ivy grows along the stream in dense, shady hickory and oak woods.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked susanzone5 (NY)
  • 8 years ago

    I believe just the old "winged" BB is invasive. The variety sold nowadays is not.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked User
  • 8 years ago
    last modified: 8 years ago

    I've seen the familiar 'Compactus' generating seedlings in a public planting here. So I'd expect that in a climate elsewhere, where seeding out into woods of the typical species is likely this much planted garden form would do so also.

    Maine Natural Areas Program - Burning Bush

    http://www.maine.gov/dacf/mnap/features/invasive_plants/euonymus.htm

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked Embothrium
  • 8 years ago

    I agree with Embo on this - if it's Euonymus alatus, it is invasive. There is a native Euonymus that has some similarities that you might be thinking of, jama.

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked NHBabs z4b-5a NH
  • 8 years ago

    It is invasive to the point where its sale is now prohibited in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and restricted in New York and Connecticut.

    And that is ANY variety of burning bush, Euonymus alatus. Named forms are just as inclined to invasiveness as the straight species!!

    deanna in ME Barely zone 6a, more like 5b thanked gardengal48 (PNW Z8/9)
  • 8 years ago

    Thanks for all the input, everybody. I never got back on the original forum and thanked you, made comments, etc. Thank you! I'll keep my eye out for them more. I would only notice them in the fall with their red color. It's possible I see them and think they are something else.