Crassula arborescens

i'm thinking Kalanchoe thyrsiflora

I'm agreeing with floral. My kalanchoe holds its paddles quite vertically, not splayed out like the plant in question. It also does not develop a stem or visible trunk - the leaves emerge direct from the soil (or appear to). The only time it develops a longer vertical extension is when it is about to flower. Those attributes seem to fit the crassula better.

Well, I’m not even sure I agree with myself now..... Not being a succulent person I’m not going to insist.

Jade plant?

Burt

could be.. as notec above..

but if it is.. you water it like a cactus ... and your pot makes me think it doesnt have a drain hole...

err towards very dry.. rather than sopping wet ... or better yet.. repot it to a better pot ... with appropriate media ... and then learn how to water that media ...

one problem with the ID.. is that plant is not in prime shape ... its scarred.. physically damaged.. and perhaps a bit sun burnt ...

ken

Thanks for all your comments

Kalanchoe luciae. But I like Burt too.

https://garden.org/plants/view/550942/Flapjacks-Kalanchoe-luciae/

I too lean towards the Kalanchoe sp. vs the Crassula sp. because the leaves are so thin but they are so closely related as in all in the same Family. But plants that have suffered can be non normal. Hold back on the water.

I was thinking 'Flapjacks' as well - a very small one...

Beautiful, Carol! I'm 100% sure that's what it is. The farina on the stem is another distinguishing feature.