Software
Houzz Logo Print
jacqueline9ca

Mystery Dijon tea rose saga...

3 years ago

I just wrote a long post about this rose, which then disappeared. Sigh. Starting over. Here are some photos of blooms on a rose which I have known was growing in a hedge (made of Japanese quince and some other stuff ) In our garden for 35 years. It blooms only once a year in the Spring, and produces 2-4 blooms. The blooms start out pink, and then gradually get bigger, and end up (IMO) a gorgeous buff color.











About 20 years ago I rooted two cuttings, and gave one to my SIL, as her ancestors planted this rose. I planted one in my garden next to two tea roses. Both plants grew, and repeat bloomed all Spring and Summer and Fall, but with much smaller leaves than the original, and lots of very small, pale pink blooms, which stayed that way. Here is a pic of my SILs plant:




Recently I posted my dilemma on here - what was it? People who know things told me it was some sort of "Dijon tea" - not 'Gloire de Dijon', but probably a seeding of that rose, lots of which had evidently been introduced into commerce in the late 19th century. I moved my 20 yr old plant which was growing next to the tea roses (which I had trouble finding - the tea roses had eaten it). I had been so disappointed with what its blooms looked like that I had been ignoring it. I moved it into my new garden, and forgetting what caused the problem, into full sun. Last Spring it grew and bloomed profusely - you guessed it, with very small leaves and small, 100% pale pink blooms which never changed. (What is the definition of insanity?). So, we dug the poor thing up AGAIN, and moved it, still in the deer protected garden, to where it would get full morning sun, but afternoon medium sort of shade from trees. It sulked, and 100% of its tiny new growth died immediately. It's been like that for months, with no action whatever. Last week (I go and look at it maybe 3-5 times a week), I saw some growth buds which looked like they might not be dead. Today I just went out and looked at it, and it has tiny new growth sprouting in 7 different places! I am so happy. I won't know what it is going to do next for months and months, but I am trying to find a balance, a "sweet spot", of how much sun/shade it needs to bloom for 6-9 months, with larger leaves and the blooms which I, at least, think are gorgeous. I will let you know what happens. Stay tuned....


Jackie

Comments (12)

  • 3 years ago
    last modified: 3 years ago

    Wow Jackie, you have an enigmatic treasure.

    Looks a bit like Ellie Beauvelain at her lightest.



  • 3 years ago

    Thank you, berrypie - 'Ellie Beauvelain' is one of the "Dijon teas", and I agree that some pictures of it look like my rose. However, some of the pink pictures are way way darker than mine gets, either in shade or in full sun. Definitely related, however. Who knows? I was told there were dozens of this type of rose introduced. I am not so interested in identifying mine, but in getting it to produce those lovely big, luscious blooms, and repeat.


    Jackie

  • 3 years ago

    No idea what it is, sorry, but what a beautiful rose @jacqueline9CA!!

  • 3 years ago

    Thanks, seasiderooftop. Yes, I think it is very beautiful, at least the once bloomer one growing inside of the hedge is.


    In case anyone thinks I might have mixed up the ones I rooted with some other rose, when I dug up the one I planted near the tea roses, the part of it way down near the ground, in full shade because the tea roses had eaten the bush, had produced one of these gorgeous, large, buff blooms. Now I just have to figure out how to get the entire bush to do that, and repeat!


    Jackie

  • 3 years ago

    What are you going to name it ?

  • 3 years ago

    I can't see the entire thread unless I post a comment - is anyone else having this problem?

  • 3 years ago

    I honestly think those are two different roses. The large plant in the bottom photo displays obvious Wichurana traits (think 'Awakening'), and the peachy rose is clearly a Tea type. The glossy, small foliage and clusters of 8 and 10 blooms on the plant shown in the last photo are not Tea characteristics. Yes, I realize you are certain that these two plants came from the same rose, but I suspect you'll eventually discover the pink rose is a different variety.

  • 3 years ago

    Oh Goodie! It is getting MORE interesting! I always thought the one I had growing next to two tea roses was Awakening, but I did not ever purchase that rose, or have it or New Dawn growing in my garden. The old one growing in the hedge has always only had ONE cane coming out of the ground, so I don't see how it could be two roses, unless it somehow sported? Anyway, here is a photo of the one I am now growing in our new garden when we had just planted it there, after pruning it and rescuing it from underneath the tea roses, if it helps:


    Jackie


    Jackie

  • 3 years ago

    Of course the photo did not post - trying again:



    Jackie

  • 3 years ago

    As the plant of it we have put into our new garden is finally putting out new growth (after being moved twice), it appears it will survive. It is currently planted where it gets morning sun, but afternoon light shade from trees. Lots of options are possible - I did think of rootstock, but I crawled underneath the hedge to look at the original one (still going) , and it still has only one cane.


    Then, I looked at all of the photos of Awakening on HMF. Some of the very large, very double, but still pink blooms do look similar to the form of the blooms on my "plant in the hedge", but none of them were that buff color. As I said, when planted in full CA sun, the blooms are very small. If it is Awakening or some closely related rose, could the buff color be a result of the dense shade it is growing in? Who knows. Also, my DH's ancestors, although they planted lots of roses all over the garden, did not go out of their way to buy rare or endangered ones, they just bought what was currently available, and "in fashion". Since they started planting roses in 1905, some of them have turned out to be very rare indeed, and from the late 19th century. From where the original rose is growing (no one would plant a rose inside of a hedge, or underneath an ornamental crab apple tree!), we think the original rose is at least 90-100 years old at the youngest. Of course, when it was planted it might have been New Dawn, or even Dr. W. Van Fleet, and then sported! So many questions, I don't expect answers, but I find it fun to speculate.


    My plan is to wait (I always say "patience is a virtue" but the reason I say that is because I don't have very much!), and see what the baby one does next Spring, and whether it repeats after that or not. I will also try and root some more cuttings from the original, and see if they are a different rose - keeping open to all possibilities.


    Jackie

0