Software
Houzz Logo Print
u510545

Low-E 366 or just Low-E or nothing?

10 years ago

I live in New York (Westchester) and have a 1926 tudor home that needs all new windows. We are finalizing our order and noticed that the glass is low-E 366. I know that is super energy efficient, but I'm worried about how much darker this will be. Right now our old windows (original) have no coating, and we really appreciate how light-filled our home feels. I just don't want that light to be adversely affected, and cannot seem to find pictures of Low-E 366 vs. Low-E vs. uncoated windows, so I can see the difference. I would appreciate any advice on this topic! We are ok giving up some energy efficiency for increased light, but don't know if there is a visible cut in the light enough to justify the downgrade on glass light emission. Thank you!!!

Comments (7)

  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    I am in the Chicago area and chose LoE 272. I read on this forum that LoE 366 glass should only be used in a "cooling dominated climate" such as Texas, Florida, Arizona. As we are only cooling here for 3-4 months out of 12, I opted for LoE 272.

    Some people use both 272 and 366 in their homes for different windows that face different directions; i.e. 366 for south-facing windows and 272 for north-facing or shaded windows. I am happy though with my all LoE 272 windows, even the ones that face south and have no shade.

  • 10 years ago

    Thank you SO MUCH for responding! Can I ask- is the glass noticeably darker than a clear, un-coated glass? Do you still get a lot of light into your home with the 272? I'm actually more nervous about blocking too much light, versus the energy efficiency angle.

  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    My LoE 272 windows replaced Pellas that had no UV coating (as an aside, don't get Pellas, avoid). I have not replaced all my windows (too expensive), but am replacing them a few at a time. So I can compare them since I currently have both. I have several very large windows that let in a lot of light, and there is no problem with that. I do not see that the glass is darker. I definitely notice less burning and sun bleaching my furniture and no longer overheating my south-facing rooms.

    I will say that my house plants that need a lot of sun have not flowered or grown, even though I was assured the LoE 272 would not affect them. My plants that need less sun like my African Violets are doing well.

    You should really speak with your contractor too since it sounds like he has proposed LoE 366. My contractor told me our climate doesn't need that though he would have ordered them if I asked.

  • 10 years ago

    So helpful- thank you! And that is particularly useful that you can see the new LoE 272 compared to your old windows with no coating, and you don't notice a difference in the glass darkness/tint. I so appreciate it!!!

  • 10 years ago

    Thank you so much!!!

  • 10 years ago

    LowE coatings were originally developed to provide triple pane performance in dual pane windows; so by way of comparison imagine if you had three lites of glass in the window or two lites with LoE-272 on the outer lite.

    And as an aside, these are glass-only numbers so they won't match the finished window performance values.

    Triple pane - U-value .29, SHGC .70, visible light transmittance 75% (of available light)

    Dual pane with 272 on surface 2 - U .25, SHGC .41, VLT 72%.

    So if you can imagine looking thru three pieces of glass, that isn't far off of the look of a dual pane with LoE-272.