First is vicia/vetch.

Compare no.1 with Vicia cracca.

The 2nd one could be a beautyberry.

Given that location, Vicia villosa is more likely. V. cracca and villosa are very similar in general appearance. V. cracca is a perennial with rhizomes, has a calyx tube that's not, or just slightly pouched on one side, and has corollas 8-13 mm long. V. villosa is a taprooted annual or biennial, with a calyx tube that's strongly pouched on one side, and corollas 12-18 mm long. Flower size and root type are the easiest tools to use for field ID. The US distribution for the two species is available on this BONAP page. If somebody can look at Internet photos and differentiate between the two, I would love to learn how it's done. In general, though, if you can pull one up with the root intact, then it is probably V. villosa.

Thank you. I could be seeing more than one species. I will try to pull some tomorrow and get better photos.