Software
Houzz Logo Print
anna_reindlova

Paul Transon vs. Paul Noel

Please help me understand the difference between these two.

Out of major British suppliers, two sell Paul Noel (David Austin and Trevor White) and one sells Paul Transon (Peter Beales) but neither of them sells both which makes me question if they really know what they sell.

The descriptions and information are not exactly consistent. DA describes PN as extremely fragrant and repeating, TW as a medium fragrance and sometimes repeating, one other supplier says very fragrant and well repeating. PB describes PT as fragrant with some repeat.

HMF doesn't help much. PT - mild fragrance, spring or summer flush with scattered later bloom. PN - strong fragrance, occasional repeat later in the season. But the ratings rate PT good+ for fragrance and PN good- for fragrance. I guess that the confusion between these two in commerce doesn't help.

Please tell me how different these are in:

- fragrance

- probability of some repeat

- size and vigour

- blackspot resistance

- rain tolerance

And how do they compare with Alberic Barbier. I think I want one of these two but I also consider AB.

Comments (3)

  • 6 years ago
    last modified: 6 years ago

    I don't have either rose, but if you could find a copy of Anne Belovich's "Ramblers and Other Rose Species Hybrids", I'm betting she would have more precise (and accurate) descriptions. I realize it's a US-produced book, but it's been in print for a while. If there's no copy in a library near you, hopefully someone on the forum owns a copy and could look them up for you. I have this book on order, along with Anne's new "Large Flowered Climbing Roses", but they won't be here for another two weeks. If you haven't got a response by the time they arrive, I'll try to remember to check back in.

    John

    Edhelka (North Wales, UK) thanked fig_insanity Z7b E TN
  • 6 years ago

    Thank you, John. I will check if I can get it here online. Public libraries around are still closed, we are still in partial lockdown.

    It's not a pressing issue. If I can't find more info, I will risk choosing one of them or I will choose Alberic Barbier, depending on my mood. They are all pretty roses. It's for a pergola so I would like a fragrant rose there, so that's the main question.

    Any experience with any of these roses is welcome, even if it is a minor experience like seeing it somewhere.

  • 6 years ago

    I've looked around at a few sites, and though it may be an exercise in futility, I've been comparing their descriptions of the two Pauls here in the US. There's no telling if they are even different roses, considering they've been muddled in commerce for years. But from the listings that give fragrance and bloom ratings, one gives PT "ff" (two out of four) for fragrance, and states no rebloom. Another site gives PT (assuming it's actually not PN, lol) the same fragrance rating, but gives it "rr" (two of possible four) for rebloom. I would assume that means a light, scattered rebloom, or a light autumn flush. So I can see why you're confused. I think you might inquire as to the provenance of the roses from each seller, to see if one or the other might have a more credible source. But even the great gardens of Europe have many mis-identified varieties, both due to death of the original plants (those wars tend to muddle things), and to loss of records.


    I did find this quote from Anne Belovich: "Paul Noel is so strongly quilled that once you see it, you won’t make the same mistake...... those absolutely incredible quilled petals." That's from a presentation she gave in California. Another reference states PN has "long, slender branches".



    Edhelka (North Wales, UK) thanked fig_insanity Z7b E TN