Software
Houzz Logo Print
joseph_corlett

Out-Of-Code Stairs

5 years ago
last modified: 5 years ago





Much too steep; too much rise without enough run. Here's a proper stair for comparison:




To get enough run, the stairbuilder would have had to create a landing at the post and switched back into or near the rear room. Of course the opening to the rear room would have to have been enlarged. Obviously this would have eaten up a lot of living room real estate which is probably why it wasn't done.

The rise on each stair is 8 1/4" and shouldn't be more than 7 3/4". The distance from tread nosing to nosing is only 8 1/4" also. As the first picture indicates, they had more run available, which would have allowed for a lower rise, but for some reason didn't use it. It would not have interfered with the door swing.

The stairs aren't 36" wide either. Since the post is structural, that's a big problem. Maybe reframe the kitchen wall?

Comments (9)

  • PRO
    5 years ago

    I think a lot depends on where the house is. This is quite typical in Europe where space is at a premium only in NA do we have all these rules about interior spaces, railings toilet space etc. Sometimes you just need to do what works in a space.

  • 5 years ago

    Clarification? Is this a dilemma you are trying to solve? I’d want to examine the rest of the layout to see if the stairs can be relocated?

  • 5 years ago

    Is that the guys house who wanted to finish his attic? That guy keeps winning....


    Exceptions. The following stairways are not required to comply with the requirements of this section:

    1. Stairways leading to non-habitable attics or crawl spaces.

    2. Non-required stairways connecting the basement directly to the exterior of the structure without communicating with any other part of the structure.

  • 5 years ago

    Easiest solution would be to try getting a variance to build with current specs ex. for the higher rise, so you can stay within your footprint. Maybe compensate with handrails on both sides? IDK.

  • 5 years ago

    I believe that the opening between the treads is also supposed to be less than a 4 inch diameter sphere. Looks like this fails on that and the railing spacing too.

  • 5 years ago

    I see the combination of high ceilings and a straight run of stairs with no landings as a prescription for disaster.


    A relative tripped at the top of stairs similar to those in the OP's photo. She fell all the way down and opened her skull on the entry door. IDK how she managed to recover as well as she did from the damage to her brain. She had to learn to speak -- and think -- all over again



    Joseph Corlett, LLC thanked chisue
  • 5 years ago

    Inspections are dubious in the best cases 😏. I know our city uses every opportunity to get into houses to tag them for CO and updated smoke detectors. Noble causes, but anytime someone swings more than a hammer, they drop in. We managed to do all of our work (properly and by licensed tradesmen) without being scrutinized. I am diligent about doing things properly even without permits. It is a mystery this staircase wasn’t red tagged.

    Joseph Corlett, LLC thanked Therese N
  • 5 years ago

    Did it pass inspection? Are permits in that city on line? I'd look to see if they pulled a permit. Maybe they redid the stairs subsequent to inspection.