Software
Houzz Logo Print
banyan_gw

dont understand about container size issue

20 years ago

Hi, my first posting on this forum. I will become a regular!

I keep on reading about some plants that allegedly cant be grown in containers because the containers need to be too big to contain the tree. Now this seems wrong on two counts. First up, you can grow a seedling in a very small pot if you want to. Ok it may not fruit well, but it can be done. Second (and far more importantly), in nature sometimes trees germinate in very hard sites, often with very limited soil. Physiological stress actually induces fruiting in preference to shoot production. There seems to be a built in stress response that as if the plant decides it needs to reproduce itself in a hurry as it knows its days are limited.

In this country (New Zealand) there are quite a lot of orchardist who deliberately grow some fruit trees in bags to restrict root volumne, usually olives and cherries. The root stress induces flower/fruit production over shoot production, meaning that every branch is actually a lot more productive than would usually be the case. Because the trees are kept very small, there is a vast increase in tree number per acre. The huge number of small but highly productive trees actually results in incresed production per acre, often nearing 400%. And trees require minimal no no pruning, and harvest is easy. Not bad.

I have heard that some avocado growers in Israel grow on very shallow soil, which creates root restriction, small trees, and hugely increased production per tree leaf area. In my personal experience, the best avocado tree I have ever seen was growing on my father-in-laws banana farm in Australia, on very hard clay. The tree was about 10 feet tall, and had so much fruit that it looked almost rediculously overburdened.

I have seen a mango tree growin in a pot about one gallon or less in size, the leaves were bonsaied, but it had about 3 full sized fruit on it. The fruit looked great, but the tree was so small that the fruit were almost full distance from the crown to the soil surface.

It seems to me that root restriction is the basis of container growing. We should actually be able to produce better results in containers than inground, with enough effort. I don't see why any tropical fruit tree should be considered too big for a manageable pot, the bonsai growers tell us that while it is possible to create miniature stature trees, it is not possible to create miniature fruit and flowers. Any tree that should grow too big will only grow to a size relative to its root mass, after which it will go into physiological stress and produce masses of fruit to reproduce its genetics.

...[now I sit back and wait for the dissenting voices...]...

Comments (5)

  • 20 years ago

    I for one agree with you for the most part. There are a lot of us growing rare fruits in containers...even some of our more climatically advantaged members grow some in containers. C'mon...say it again...."climatically advantaged". Y'all like that don't you? This is of course, quite the opposite of my climatically challenged area of Ohio. But I digress.

    Due to my climate...I have no choice but to keep most of my plants container-bound. My plan all along has been to practice agressive pruning to keep the plants smaller and more manageable. The experience I've had with my apple trees is that the more I prune, the more apples I get the next season.

    Is there a downside to this somewhere? I believe there is. Even if pruned well, these trees are going to reach some size. There's root restriction and then there's just a root mass where there is very little soil left in the container! We've all experienced that. You grab the plant by the trunk, pull, and the entire plant comes out of the container. Where the hell is all the soil? I can't see any benefit to the plant when it reaches this point. No way to retain moisture and other goodies that soil provides. Okay, time to root prune and replant. This is fine and dandy and I do this all the time...when the plants are manageable. This is not going to be the case when these plants reach a certain size/weight. This has been a huge concern of mine for some time. And I'm certainly open to any suggestions this group may have.

    So while these plants that are grown in hard clay and other restrictive soils, they are still getting more benifits from that little bit of soil than I can probably provide my plants in containers if I let the roots take over the container. Maybe this is where the dissention stems from?

    Could I do a Bill Whitman in my greenhouse? Meaning, could I remove all of my solid clay, high PH soil and replace with the stuff our plants love? Sure, but it would kill me physically and financially!

  • 20 years ago

    Jay, you make a couple good points. First up I think you northerners (and I mean WAY north from my 39S!) are leading the way in tropicals in marginal climates, because you know you need to containerise. People like me in more benign climates keep on planting our mangos and papayas in the ground. Sure they live a while, but never amount to anything and eventually die. ON the Cloudforest forum your collection is one of the best, far outstripping all us 'more favoured' climate guys.

    So, it seems ot me that instead of root pruning physically you should do it passively. All that is needed is a permeable sided container. As the roots reach the edges of the pot, they 'air prune' off. The leading tip dies, resulting in a proliferation of secondary roots. This actually results in a far more efficient root system, and is the way the NZ commercial guys do it. Much easier too!

    Secondly, how about growing in soil? in NAtural systems there are very few fruit trees that grow in pure organic media. Even the deepest rainforest does not have organic matter levels higher than 50%, and most of the tropical fruit trees thrive in very low C soils. I know one of the biggest avocado nuseries in South Africa uses straight soil with no organic matter at all to grow their stock in. I suspect if you used a beach sand textured soil with an organic/compost mulch, and permeable pots allowing air pruning, both these problems would disappear.

  • 20 years ago

    All sounds good but I for one have never seen permeable pots large enough to contain my plants. As for planting in the soil. I would love to. The problem is that I would have to remove nearly all of it due to being only hard-packed clay with a PH of 7+. I would have to dig out a LOT! As soon as one of my low PH loving plants starting hitting native soil, it would start to die. How deep is deep enough? How far out? I'm going to attempt it with a few plants. Lot of work man. This is the one huge negative I see with container growing. I don't know of any good solution to the problem.

  • 20 years ago

    Make your own permeable pots by drilling holes in normal pots.

    John

  • 20 years ago

    I meant planting in soil in pots. 7pH hard clay is not a goer at all obviously. Is it possible to get some sand locally? Sand will not break down like organic media. Sandy loam soil which does not go hard into lumps is better still.

    I have 600 acres most of which is based on a structure-less volcanic origin tephra subsoil, of a sandy loam texture, and pH about 6.0. I use this subsoil as my standard potting media, and find most of my plants perform very well in it. It has totally constant CEC, N drawdown is zero, and the aeration properties are totaly consistent. This soil is texturely excellent, but of very low fertility. But it grows beautiful palms with a bit of mineral fert added, and also requires a lot less water than organic media, while still allowing excellent drainage. It should be good for potted fruit trees as well, although I confess readily that I am only just beginning to trial this. Got a 6 foot tall Jakfruit and some baby mangoes and bananas so far.

Sponsored
Mary Shipley Interiors
Average rating: 4.8 out of 5 stars34 Reviews
Columbus OH Premier Interior Designer 10x Best of Houzz