Software
Houzz Logo Print
vosseller_cottage

Insulating Shake Shingle House (has no sheathing)

15 years ago

Hi all, (sorry for the cross post, posted in the wrong forum the first time).

Another insulation question, I couldn't quite find what I was looking for in previous threads. I have a 1920's shake-shingle cottage. Most of the house is shake over planked walls (lath and plaster interior). However, there is an uninsulated 12'x12' addition that was built around a stairwell of sorts leading from the kitchen to the basement. Lot's of wasted space, so I'm going to reconfigure it and make it more useful. I also lose heat from the kitchen to it.

The walls of the addition consist only of shake nailed to horizontal strips about 12" apart (no exterior sheathing), I can see the shake from the inside. The interior is finished with a cardboard like material. I plan to sheet rock the interior, but I'm clueless how to insulate these walls. Should I put some kind of barrier between the studs, before I insulate? Otherwise any water that get's between the shingles will wet the insulation. Suggestions on type of insulation (I live in New Jersey)? Advice appreciated. Thanks!

p.s. Would the same apply to exterior walls WITH planking?)

Comments (5)

  • 15 years ago

    You can't properly insulate it the way it is. Cellulose or fibereglass will absorb water, spray foam might work, but you couldn't repair the shingles without destroying the insulation.

    It's a small area. For the simplest approach, strip off the shingles and furring, put on new sheathing, housewrap or lapped #30 felt and furring and reshingle. Inside, get rid of the cardboard, use fiberglass batts or cellulose and drywall.

  • 15 years ago

    I like the idea of spray foam, but to prevent real moisture problems, add 1/2" rigid foam board cut into strips between the studs and situated tight to the nailing strips. The insulation co can then spray their product right over the rigid foam. This way some air space is retained under the shingles so they can dry out after downpours, and repairs are enabled for the future; the siding can be taken off without any disturbance to the expensive sprayed foam.
    Casey

  • 15 years ago

    Unfortunately, this approach creates a rainscreen wall that is extremely vulnerable to water penetration rather than water shedding and diversion. Which is contrary to the reason for having a rainscreen wall in the first place.

    Here is a link that might be useful: rainscreen wall

  • 15 years ago

    Huh? It's no more susceptible to water penetration that way than it is now. There's still an air gap under the shingles, only now it only vents back outside. They are wood shingles, like a roof, they shed water. The rainscreen idea is applied to deal with horrible siding choices like vinyl and hardi which let in water at the seams (and lest I fail to mention, windows with nail fins as attachments instead of wood trim) instead of excluding water like more traditional types; wood clapboards, shakes, shingles.
    The rainscreen concept didn't exist in residential 30 years ago because it was unnecessary with traditional techniques and materials.
    Casey

  • 15 years ago

    Well, I agree, the the most thorough method would be to remove the shake, sheath, then reshingle. Unfortunately that's not an option due to the additional expense. The existing shingles wouldn't survive, so no hope of reuse there.

    The shingles do shed water, but are 80+ years old, so water getting between into any cracked shingles is why I fear for insulation there. Formulating Plan B. Thanks both you've given me some ideas to work with.