OK, here's the sitch. My largest hemlock is maybe 55' or 60' high. It was beset by adelgids when I bought the house and probably would have died in a few more years. I treated it with Merit, twice, and 2007 and 2008, and they've never come back. A little fertilizer helped the crown recover some density. Never the less it had lost one whole side of its lower branches because it was shaded out by a stupidly placed weed tree, and it looks pretty hideous from most perspectives. I don't want to have to use Merit/generic imidocloprid again (and may not have the chance in a few years) so I'd slated it for removal in the next five years anyhow. I've planted things around it to continue to shade the rhodies & other BLEs I planted to the north of it.
What happened is some storm in the late summer or fall caused a large branch about 1/4 of the way down to snap off. So, it's got a potential "widowmaker" hanging in it. BUT, I didn't realize the tear went right into the trunk. This winter, the fact that the trunk had such a tear has apparently made the entire 1/4 top of it die off. Yes the whole top crown. As bad as the tree looked before, now it's really starting to look bad.
Here's my crazy idea. For the next 3-4 years, I'd really still like to the have the shade of its major lower branch, which leans toward the north: it seemingly strongly diverged away from the trunk, about 6' up, about 20-25 years ago, to get away the shade cast by the weedy maple. Since my tree guy always charges more to bring in the big boom trunk, I'm thinking, just do this: have him remove the top 3/4 of the tree. Completely. Leave about 12'-15' of the trunk, including the big diverging branch and 2-3 typical lateral branches. Yes, this will look like crap for a few years. But no worse than if I do nothing and the top 15' of a 60' hemlock is bare. This will allow more time for various shade giving species to continue to fill in the area. When I'm ready to remove it, I can do it myself because I won't need a boom truck to come in there.
Worse possible outcome I suppose is that the main side branch, arcing to the north in a curved form, will at some point collapse, now that it isn't sheltered by the crown. But it is by far the thickest branch on the tree. I just don't see that happening barring a microburst or something.
Thoughts?
btw will try to post a pic this weekend
wisconsitom
User
Related Professionals
Pine Bluff Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · Fresno Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · San Jose Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · Toronto Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · Fayetteville Landscape Contractors · Murfreesboro Landscape Contractors · Gloucester Landscape Contractors · Rochester Landscape Contractors · Las Cruces Landscape Contractors · Ontario Landscape Contractors · Fayetteville Home Builders · Coldwater Home Builders · Jamestown Home Builders · Clearlake Home Builders · Modesto Home Buildersbengz6westmd
Toronado3800 Zone 6 St Louis
UpperBayGardener (zone 7)Original Author
wisconsitom
Mike McGarvey
wisconsitom