Smivies, I doubt that, the Cones are different

You haven't provided photos that have enough detail to see the cones. Without that, we're all guessing between likely candidates.

Unless it's an irrigated location, it is probably not P. taeda.

Longleaf Pine maybe, I found this picture and it looks similar

Details of bark, shoots, buds, leaves, cones and sometimes even seeds need to be seen and considered before reliable identification becomes possible.

The issue with the southeast North American pines (ditto for Mexican pines) is that they are not well adapted to mediterranean climates of north Africa. Perhaps at higher elevations in the Atlas mountains were there are at least moderate summer rains but not at lower elevations. You should really be looking at Mediterranean and Californian pines. Anything from a summer monsoonal area (eg. Arizona, himalayas) needs a fair bit of water in the summer.

Without at least a cone and/or close up of the foliage, I can't tell you what it is but I can say what it is most likely to be and most certainly what it is not likely to be.

maybe this pic would help? it's located 950 m above sea level, I'm pretty sure the French planted it during their Colonization to Algeria

Sorry but all of your shots continue to be taken from too far away. In the last one we still cannot even see how many needles there are per bundle.

thnx anyway

All you have to do is post adequately close views of pertinent parts and then you should be able to get useful commentary here. That probably results in an identification.

950m elevation probably rules out P. canariensis due to low winter temperatures. Still don't believe the summer precipitation is enough for P. taeda or P. palustris. Have you considered P. pinaster? Could also be a Californian...P. radiata.

it's not a wild tree, it was planted in a Garden so it gets enough water in the summer, I'll try to take close photos next time, thnx

P. pinaster is found in the coasts only

Not true re: the natural distribution of P. pinaster...its natural range extends far inland in suitable climates and also into the Atlas mountains of North Africa growing up to 2000m elevation in Morocco.

Also, before P. radiata gained popularity, it was the European pine plantation species of choice.

As a plantation tree, it has also escaped cultivation in suitable climates and is somewhat of an invasive species outside the Mediterranean basin (similar issue with P. radiata).

So not too surprising if it's a planted tree with French colonial origins, a seed blown-in volunteer tree, or transplant from elsewhere in Algeria.

Needles too long and short-lived for Pinus radiata. Tree also looks like it is not multi-nodal.

maybe it's an unknown kind of pine lol

So, P. pinaster is still on the table pending more useful photos...

Pinus pinaster

I can't go inside to take close pics but I found this, each one is 9 inches tall (23 cm)

So some bundles at least have 3 needles (some kinds of pines have varying needle counts right on the same tree).

Maybe if you look around there is another example of the same kind somewhere in the area that you can get close enough to for good close shots of morphological features, including mature bark, shoots, stem buds, cones and maybe even some persisting seeds (perhaps stuck inside cones).

it's the only one, all the other pines around here are Pinus Halepensis,