There's little to no evidence that Picea orientalis 'Aurea Pendula' is a legitimate cultivar. Achieving cultivar status depends on being able to trace a clone to its original mutation. In this case, it also needs to have been originally named prior to 1959.

Any chance your thinking about
Picea omorika 'Aurea' ?

conifers are trees .. and basically.. trees never stop growing ...

many size estimates of cultivars are at 10 years .. and you can presume they will be twice that in 20 years ... etc .. forever ...

note at this link ... there is an aurea .. and there is a pendula.. but there is not aurea pendula .. so we are at a loss to help you ... [also note that first 2 links are from davids website ... the american conifer society site... and by his i me he is fearless leader .. lol]

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Picea+Orientalis+Aurea+Pendula&t=ffcm&ia=web

do you have a link .... website.. or something .... so we can look at it ...

all that said ... P.o. tend to be trees with aggressive annual growth ... in my experience ...

ken

Thank you all, I noticed in researching this plant that I really couldn't find it with this name, and no cultivar name on the tag. I'll post a pic, I just planted it.

Closer views needed to tell the species.

then who told you it was an orientalis ?

maybe Picea abies

ron

as embo said - real close pic would help

I could be wrong but it sure looks like a 'Skylands' at a glance...