Software
Houzz Logo Print
jalcon_gw

Weeping Alaskan Cedar types. Does anyone REALLY know? *pics*

9 years ago

I've searched and found a thread about this very thing. But seems that thread never had a final answer. Maybe no one really knows. Basically..when you look up weeping alaskan cedars..you get two types..you get the kind that are much fuller in look...and you get the ones that have long arms, extending outward, with a very (IMO) cool look. We'll call these #1 style. See this pic here of one up the street.

And these...

Now..you ALSO, have these...#2 style...much fuller...and IMO boring.

So...with that said...does anyone ACTUALLY know the difference? Because everything I read is conflicting. And the long thread about it...no real answers in there either. For example, some say "pendula" has the long arms...some say "pendula" is the fuller look.


I ask, because I really want the #1 style. I think they are awesome looking. Can anyone help out once and for all? Thanks!

Comments (12)

  • 9 years ago

    The species as well as the cultivars can be variable. I prefer the more narrow form.

    Cupressus (no longer Chamaecyparis) nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'

    Yes, that is one of it's arms shooting out on the lower right.

    tj

  • 9 years ago
    last modified: 9 years ago

    Yeah, I wonder if 'Green Arrow' will ever have multiple arms shooting out going up the trunk...or if it stays vary narrow..

    It's odd, I know that each species can be variable, but wow.....they look like totally different trees. They are completely different habits/forms.....between what I call 'style 1' and 'style 2'...

  • 9 years ago
    last modified: 9 years ago

    Focus on named, clonal cultivars for comparative predictability and uniformity. Otherwise you are trying to hammer a wild species into predetermined holes on a board, marveling that its various different expressions don't all fit perfectly. And remember that older, Latin cultivar names are liable to have been used for more than one introduction over time.

  • 9 years ago

    I see what you are saying, but no matter what you put into "google images", you get conflicting data. I guess the short answer is that this species is highly variable in what form it will take.....unlike most trees which end up having certain characteristics... I just wondered if anyone knew which tree I should look for to give me the best chance of having one with long, outreaching arms. I suppose maybe it's complete luck of the draw..

  • 9 years ago
    last modified: 9 years ago

    I have one with the 'stretched-out arms', your first picture, is called Cupressus nootkatensis 'Pendula'. It is about 25 ft tall and grows well. I have also one of the very slim types, is Cupressus nootkatensis 'Van den Akker', is only 6 ft and looks OK, but is growing only very slowly. Another slim one with the name Cupressus nootkatensis 'Strict Weeping' lost its top possibly at its graft the first year and is growing very slowly from its base, but still looks interesting. I thought my zone 5 is too cold, but published limit is -30 F, so who knows.

    I have none of the round compact ones, but why would you have one of those when you can have one like your picture #1 shows?

    Bernd

  • 9 years ago

    I have one of your type 1 plants,,was sold as 'Pendula' ,,just got lucky

    ron

  • 9 years ago

    Hmmm...interesting. Usually the pictures that come up for 'Pendula' are much more columnar than I'd like...I suppose a lot of it is luck of the draw..

  • 9 years ago

    Old Latin cultivar name with there having been plenty of time for numbers of independent introductions to have been made.

  • 9 years ago

    still say you want juballee

  • 6 years ago

    Greetings from Utah the first is called Weeping Alaskan Cedar just bought one at my local Home Depot (Provo)

  • 6 years ago
    last modified: 6 years ago

    Add to my last ; also have seen #1 type called 'Glauca Pendula'

    Ron