Software
Houzz Logo Print
p_august

Wire Tankless Electric from Two Sub-panels?

7 years ago
last modified: 7 years ago

Am considering upgrading my vacation home's old, giant, hot water heater to a tankless. Why heat water when I'm rarely there, right?

The water heater models I'm considering generally require 120 amps total, and are powered by three separate 40 amp circuits (each on its own dual pole 240v breaker with 8/2 grounded wire). This is within the capacity of the home's electrical service (upgraded by the prior owner for, um, indoor agricultural use). However, there's not enough room in either subpanel for 3 240v circuits. They're right next to each other, though, and there's enough empty space to use 2 40A circuits from 1 panel, and 1 40A circuit from the other.

Is there any reason why I shouldn't use the two sub-panels in this fashion? To my mind, the two-subpanel set up side by side is like having one large subpanel, but I am not a professional and wouldn't move forward with this without being 100% certain I'm OK.

Comments (9)

  • 7 years ago

    If your only concern is the waste of energy (and $) of heating the water while you aren't there, then just turn your tank down (or off) when you leave.

  • 7 years ago
    last modified: 7 years ago

    Thanks, Ron. They are separately fed from the main and I would make sure they can each handle their load.

    Way to not answer the question Greg. I need to replace it anyways and am looking at options. If you're not going to contribute to the topic of discussion please don't bother replying.

  • 7 years ago

    Wow. Your specific question was already answered, so I just thought I'd give you something else to consider that maybe you hadn't.

    If it's not helpful, then you don't have to do it. I was just trying to being helpful.

  • 7 years ago

    It's not helpful at all as it didn't address my issue. It's just obnoxious and irrelevant.

  • 7 years ago

    Not really irrelevant. I was going to suggest if you didn't have propane, an electric POU heater is an energy hog. Depending on your water temperature, it may not heat as well as you want while your meter is whirling away (only so much temperature rise through the unit). The less expensive alternative might be to use a smaller electric tank that you turn off and drain when not there.

    I had a friend with a vacation home with two full baths and laundry. She only had a 20gl tank that was only active when occupied.

  • 7 years ago
    last modified: 7 years ago

    This is not a POINT OF USE heater (those have much smaller power consumptions). He's talking about the 24 or 27 KW whole house unit. Anyway POU or not, the thing is still likely a win over a tanked heater. It takes about 18KWh to take 50 gallons of water up to temp. This thing will flow 50 gallons in about 15 minutes, and only using 7 KWh to do it.

    The biggest gripe with these things is making sure you have the elecrical capacity both in Amps and in pole positions on your panel to run it. Paul says he has enough...

  • 7 years ago

    greg-

    For what it's worth, I thought your comment was entirely appropriate. When asking for advice, an OP can always choose to ignore a comment without getting huffy about it not conforming to their precise mindset.

  • 7 years ago

    R: sorry. I tend to use POU generically to cover all the tankless units out there. I'll be more explicit in the future.