This rose is going to have to be dug up from it's current spot in my garden; the soil preparation in that area was just too badly done, and I intend to re-vamp it. But I'm undecided about what to do with this plant-move it or dump it? It's pretty enough when in bloom, but has the unpleasant tendancy to hold onto it's spent blooms after flowering, so the plant looks ugly unless I dead-head it,and it doesn't re-bloom. My garden is huge,and I seriously don't have much time available for dead-heading even re-bloomers. What's more, in my climate,after the main flush,it is just too hot to want to spend much time outdoors.
However, the fact remains that it is growing in very bad soil. Might that be the cause of it's unpleasantness? I see on it's page on HMF that there's a photo of the plant showing a fine crop of hips,which makes me think that at least in some places the rose must be capable of dropping those ugly mummified dead flowers. I also see that it's listed as a setigera. I wonder if setigeras just don't like my climate-I used to have Gem of the Prairies but wound up sp-ing it; it grew quite vigorously but was incredibly stingy with it's blooms...
Any thoughts or experiences about this rose and/or setigeras in general would be much appreciated!
seasiderooftop
Sheila z8a Rogue Valley OR
Related Professionals
Orlando Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · Madison Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · New Haven Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · Athens Landscape Contractors · Lake Charles Landscape Contractors · Saint Marys Landscape Contractors · Miami Home Builders · Port Saint Lucie Home Builders · Somerset Home Builders · Marinette Home Builders · Vernal Home Builders · Hopkinsville Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · Lincoln Landscape Architects & Landscape Designers · Erie Landscape Contractors · Lagrange Landscape ContractorsAlana8aSC
UserOriginal Author