Shop Products
Houzz Logo Print
3katz4me

Speaking of Medicare Advantage plans

3katz4me
2 years ago
last modified: 2 years ago

Below article in today's online Wall Street Journal. This situation might have something to do with why these plans are so aggressively promoted by insurance companies.

By Anna Wilde Mathews Sept. 22, 2021 5:30 am ET

Medicare insurers drew $9.2 billion in federal payments in one year through controversial billing practices, with 20 companies benefiting disproportionately and together accounting for more than half of the total, according to federal health investigators.

The findings by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services are the latest sign of growing scrutiny of Medicare Advantage insurers, which offer private plans under the federal benefit program.

The inspector general’s report focuses on certain procedures used by insurers to document health conditions, which helps determine how much they are paid. The investigators said the findings raise concerns that insurers might be gaming the process to improperly boost federal payments.

Among the 20 companies flagged in the report, the investigators found that one received approximately 40% of the questionable payments, or $3.7 billion, while enrolling only 22% of Medicare Advantage customers. The report didn’t name the company. Federal data compiled by analysts at BMO Capital Markets shows that enrollment share closely matched that of industry giant UnitedHealth Group Inc.’s UNH -0.49% UnitedHealthcare during the period covered in the report.

The company highlighted in the report “definitely stood out and looked quite different from the other companies,” Jacqualine Reid, who led the OIG team that wrote the report, said in an interview.

UnitedHealth said, “UnitedHealthcare’s in-home clinical care programs provide significant benefits to seniors and for years have been valuable offerings to ensure our members continue to receive cost-effective, appropriate care. Our Medicare Advantage risk-adjustment program is transparent and compliant with CMS rules.” CMS—the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services—oversees the Medicare Advantage program.

A CMS spokeswoman pointed to its responses included in the report, in which it said the recommendations would be taken under consideration and that CMS is “committed to ensuring that diagnoses that [Medicare Advantage organizations] submit for risk adjustment are accurate.”

The findings by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services are the latest sign of growing scrutiny of Medicare Advantage insurers.

The new report, which The Wall Street Journal reviewed ahead of its expected release on Wednesday, focused on enrollment and documentation in 2016, and the resulting payments in 2017.

At the heart of the investigation were the ways insurers in the Medicare Advantage program document diagnoses for enrollees. The payments the companies receive from the federal government are tied to the health status of their customers. Patients with more, and more serious, diagnoses generally draw higher payments for the health plans.

The HHS inspector general’s investigation focused on two controversial strategies used by Medicare Advantage companies to tally diagnoses.

In one, the insurers or their contractors review patients’ charts for evidence of diagnoses that doctors didn’t specifically flag. The other involves health-risk assessments, or HRAs, that are often conducted by the vendors in patients’ homes.

Both strategies are allowed under Medicare rules, but “our findings raise concerns about the extent to which certain MA companies may have inappropriately leveraged both chart reviews and HRAs to maximize risk-adjusted payments,” the report said.

The report focused on diagnoses generated by these two methods that weren’t also found in the insurers’ records of services rendered to patients, implying that patients didn’t get care tied to these diagnoses.

The suspect diagnoses were linked to around $9.2 billion in payments to Medicare Advantage plans in 2017, according to the report. The 20 companies that benefited disproportionately together drew 54% of that total while representing 31% of enrollment, the report said. The remaining 46% of the $9.2 billion went to 142 companies that collectively enrolled 69% of the Medicare Advantage membership.

The unnamed large company highlighted in the report generated about 58% of the payments in the analysis drawn by health-risk assessments. Its share was particularly large in payments tied to certain diagnoses, such as respiratory arrest, protein-calorie malnutrition and major depressive, bipolar and paranoid disorders, according to the report.

The report’s recommendations include having CMS “take additional actions to determine the appropriateness of payments and care for the one MA company that substantially drove risk-adjusted payments from chart reviews and HRAs.”

UnitedHealth is the biggest player in Medicare Advantage, a major growth engine for the industry.

The total number of people enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans has risen to more than 26 million this year, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis released in June. That is about 42% of all Medicare beneficiaries, up from 31% five years ago.

Concerns that insurers are inflating the “risk scores” that result from documenting enrollees’ diagnoses are longstanding, but federal prosecutors’ and investigators’ focus on industry practices has increased in recent years.

In March 2020, federal prosecutors sued Anthem Inc., alleging the Indianapolis-based insurer had fraudulently reaped overpayments from the federal government by failing to delete inaccurate diagnosis codes.

Federal prosecutors in July of this year announced they were intervening in whistleblower suits against Kaiser Permanente, also focused on risk-score documentation.

Last week, the Justice Department joined another whistleblower action, suing Independent Health Association, a Buffalo-based insurer. The suit alleged that Independent Health submitted diagnosis codes that weren’t supported by evidence.

Anthem declined to comment. Kaiser Permanente said in a previous statement that it was “compliant with Medicare Advantage program requirements, and we intend to strongly defend against the lawsuits alleging otherwise.” A spokesman for Independent Health said it denied “all allegations of wrongdoing in this lawsuit.”

In April, the HHS Office of Inspector General released an audit of diagnosis codes submitted by Humana Inc. that found the company, the-second biggest Medicare Advantage provider after UnitedHealth, was overpaid about $200 million for 2015. Humana said at the time that the inspector general’s “methodology is inconsistent with statistical and actuarial principles,” and said it would work cooperatively to resolve the review.

The HHS inspector general also released reports last year and in 2019 looking at the industry’s diagnosis-documentation practices.

Comments (9)

  • User
    2 years ago

    We now have an Advantage plan as part of the benefit from the University retirement plan. Originally years ago it was just BCBS

    only no Advantage component. then after a number of years it became only United Health Care and then we had Medicare as primary with the UHC as supplement. Then Advantage came and still we had UHC. Now we still have Advantage but with Humana.


    ALL of these programs did/ do in home assessment annually. Originally we went along with it as they offered gift cards if you let them come and do assessment and teaching. We stopped all of these the past couple years . We take no meds and have no health issues ” knock on wood ” at 70 and 74. I wondered why they called and called trying to persuade us to let them come!!! I finally blocked the number after saying quite firmly NO!


    We are very happy with our coverage and the price due to the University backing is extremely inexpensive. When we have needed anything it has always covered virtually every penny and never any hesitation with any of the three companies. In fact the Silver Sneakers pays $720 a year alone for our gyms.


    I am not surprised that there is something selfserving in their home visits. Everyone is out for every dime. c

  • woodrose
    2 years ago

    That's a very interesting and informative report, 2katz4me. I've avoided Unitedhealthcare's Medicare Advantage because they're such an annoying company. I constantly receive mailings from them which immediately go in the trash, while receiving very few from other companies. I don't trust companies that try to push something at you that hard. Thank you for sharing this article, it confirmed my suspicions. I do have a Humana Advantage Plan, but they've done very well, so far.

    I do know some doctors and pharmacies will try to push things on you and take advantage of Medicare, also. I don't know how Medicare ever going to stop this.

  • Tina Marie
    2 years ago

    @User that is really very interesting! My dad had UHC as a supplemental and hated it. My MIL has Humana and has had it for years. I'm not sure if she is Medicare now or Medicare Advantage. But Humana did her and my FIL well through his Leukemia and she went through cancer treatment several years ago. She paid for hardly anything! She also did the Silver Sneakers until a year or so ago. Her gym closed and there is not another one convenient to her. But what is so interesting is neither my dad or my in-laws have EVER had home visits?! Perhaps that is your state? My dad has been gone almost a year now, but he had the twice yearly visits with his physician. One was his physical and the other a wellness visit. My MIL also does that.

  • User
    2 years ago

    @Tina Marie yes we could and have done both visits at our MD office as it is offered. But we were doing the wellness here at home and physical at MD. i can tell you that both of my parents got wonderful care through UHC back in the mid late 90’s. It was their supplement. We also got great response from them whenever we had a question, they always actually answered their phone!!! No press this press that!


    Humana so far has been fine but we dont have any health problems. DH had to have a comprehensive eye exam from a retinal specialist due to a genetic problem and he periodically gets PT for his back and all the companies have been very helpful. we are always grateful that we have amazing cheap healthcare due to our University affiliation. c

  • Tina Marie
    2 years ago

    Same for us so far. i retired from a university and was a state employee. too young for medicare but we have a bcbs plan that is wonderful.

  • Moxie
    2 years ago

    Not surprised that United Healthcare is on the list. I wouldn't touch their products with a 10-foot pole. I knew software engineers worked for UHC. I also worked for a UHC spinoff that retained the UHC culture. I resigned after 12 weeks. Yes, it was that bad!


    I've been happy with my Medicare Advantage plan. It's from the same provider I had when working and it almost identical. BCBS Medicare Advantage plan has a good reputation in my area, too.

  • 3katz4me
    Original Author
    2 years ago

    Yeah Moxie - I know what you mean about UHC being that we live in the same metro as the headquarters. Since I worked in healthcare IT I would see many job postings for them - bureaucratic, nonsense job descriptions. I always told myself I'd know I'd hit rock bottom if I had to take a job there. I saw a list yesterday of the largest healthcare companies by market cap - they are far and away the largest. You need to generate a lot of revenue to feed a huge, waste generating machine like that. My company was no where near that large and it still had large pockets of waste and inefficiency. Ahh....thankfully I'm now retired from all that. 😊

  • pamike
    2 years ago

    I would add, the large market cap for United Healthcare, in part, is the AARP name recognition. It seems people don't do much homework when first becoming eligible, and aren't aware of the many other Medicare providers for advantage plans, or supplements, but are members of AARP and so rely on their products for Medicare coverage. As a volunteer medicare counselor, the lions share of Medicare subscribers for supplements is with United Healthcare, a whopping 30%, vs less than 1% for most other providers.

  • pamike
    2 years ago

    "I do know some doctors and pharmacies will try to push things on you and take advantage of Medicare, also. I don't know how Medicare ever going to stop this."


    One stop-gap measure is our duty as Medicare beneficiaries to report on questionable practices that may indicate fraud or abuse going on to 1-800-Medicare. We are the eyes and ears for the Medicare program, who can help police the system and prevent costly overcharges to Medicare that cheats us all.