There are many makers of similar sofas. At many price points. (I'd check out the Younger & Co.'s Michael for a similar feel. I've used this sofa in a few short term rentals and they are holding up beautifully)) But I would not do R&B Andre sofa in those two lengths because they both are configured the same,with two seat cushions. That means the long one will look lean,expansive and sleek and the much shorter 67" nearby looks dumpy and meager to me. Of course ,ymmv.

I agree with the two-sofa recommendation. You garage-saled into the current sofa/loveseat arrangment (nothing wrong with garage sale thriftiness!), but when you are buying something new, why not go with a fresh arrangement rather than repeating something frm the past?

I have Design Within Reach’s Bantam sofa, which I like very much, and with monthly cushion flipping has held up very well. (almost 5 years, daily use).

its very similar in style, and I like the single cushion. It certainly is pricey too, but they do regularly have 15% off sales.

No loveseats ever 2 sofas or a sofa 2 chairs for more comfortable seating and also the abitity to change the layout from time to time. Since you have 2 chairs just 2 sofas that match

Thanks Patricia... are you suggesting that design wise, two identical sofas is better than just one? And regardless, don’t get a loveseat?

Ha, two sofas give you couch potato parity -- both partners can stretch out at the same time.... an investment in domestic harmony.

Plus, loveseats are useless for anyone but actual lovers (and we don't really want to watch them in our living rooms). Otherwise loveseats are just oversized chairs.

No loveseat. Either 2 lounge chairs or another sofa.

I would select 2 matching lounge chairs and one featured chair to correlate with the sofa.

Interesting. We have a large great room (242" on the SHORT wall) that can likely accommodate the 101" largest of the four sizes offered by R&B with the Andre? What about a 101" long sofa and a 76" small sofa? I'm not sure if you're all saying that it is NEVER a good idea to use two sofas of differing lengths, or just in this particular case? Are loveseats or smallish sofas of 76" just never a good idea?

The Katz Gold reminds me of the couch I lived with from birth to age 8 1/2 (1968-1976).

I don't think ours had legs like that, but the color was the same.

I read the term "loveseat" used for seating of all sorts, with lengths from 48" -82". The never do a "loveseat" phrase is just a catchphrase with little utility. Just like "no more than two people will ever sit on a sofa together".

My experience is that the interior dimensions/configuration of a sofa matter, so a 70" sofa with lean arms and a bench cushion seat, will happily accommodate 2 and often 3, say at a crowded party. By happily I mean that someone will sit and stay awhile, not stand or look for another chair. Same sofa with two cushions will hardly ever get that third person, because no one wants to sit on the crack between the cushions. And that can be a problem in general with two cushion sofas. Of any length. Fun fact: Arne Jacobsen's 3 seater sofa is still in production (DWR) and is still 71.75 inches long. With 3 distinct seats. (Granted today, people are bigger, but my general concept holds)

OP, in your situation a long lean sofa and a somewhat shorter twin might be just the ticket. Or not. But before ordering,get a furniture plan together for the whole space. That plan should encompass how many people you want to regularly seat, and roughly how many when entertaining. Include table sizes,lamps,etc. (& round here, I like a mix of softness/firmness and seat heights because some of our friends have mobility issues)

Joybird offers similar style sofas. We have a 3yr old Eliot sectional and Eastwood chairs that look just like the day we got them (daily use) and just bought a Calhoun sofa and ottoman for our loft. We've been very happy with our purchases.