I would repair or replace the slider door.

The mirror is broken (again) it can't be repaired. I cant get an exact match. The option are remove them and either 2 new non mirrored sliders or my wardrobe idea or?

So 11” for suitcases? I think that‘s too narrow. Just replace with non-mirrored doors.

The opening is 60( oops) the closet is quite a bit bigger and deeper then the wardrobe. Ikea has 46 " version too 14 15 inches to get them in and 18 " to store them. Well maybe it's a bad idea

A wardrobe will give you and renters a smaller area to use for their things. And having suitcases or other things in site during my stay would be a negative. Replacing the doors would be my choice.

I would replace the doors. Personally, I would find your suggested "fix" very slipshod if I were renting a vacation home.

Well that's no good since it's the more expensive option.

Before everyone totally hates on my idea check this out . I think it looks really good . Picture is below. I would have an odd space though. https://www.thehappyhousie.com/replacing-our-reach-in-closet-with-an-ikea-pax-closet-system/

My bedroom reach in closet is about 70” w x 24” d. with double doors and we built Ikea Pax interior system inside it. I used 2 of 50cm x 35cm frames and 1 of 75cm x 35cm frame, and installed their drawers, shelves, pant hanger and closet rods. Though the frame depth I used (35cm) is shallow it still works well because I’m still able to open all the drawers. Ikea showroom shows the 35cm depth closet with the clothing facing outwards on the rod, but because my actual closet depth is 24” i can still hang the clothing sideways. When we priced out other lines like Closet Maid, Elfa,etc, is was much more expensive, this was a great solution, I’ll be doing the same thing for my husbands closet.

So you're saying that getting new doors, that are not mirrored, would be more than the wardrobe?

Of course that example looks good, the doors are flush with the wall and look built-in. Based on your description of your proposed idea it would not have the same effect; to be frank, it would look like you stuffed a wardrobe in a closet. It's certainly not impossible but some effort will need to be made to make it look good. That will take $$. And once you consider the cost of paying someone to make it look correct, you might as well just have bought new doors and saved yourself the hassle.

And what the above poster said about the floor is something to consider--the damage to the floor from track removal and whether there is even an acceptable surface under the track.

I don't think anyone is necessarily "hating" on the idea but the aesthetics of the plan, as described, would likely be sub-par.

Anna no the doors are less then the wardrobe. I was referring to my idea as being not good. The last thing I want to do is spend more money and have it look cheaper. The project above was a DIY . trim is easy and not structural so no worries. The floor is tiled so no worries there either. Doors I think I will go with a couple of 2 panel doors that look coastal.

I love how it looks, I'm steering clear of glass and mirrors though

I think if you live it do it but it would be a no go for me. BTW I hate mirrored doors in bedrooms so not big deal. Have you looked at the Pax doors or even Pax system for that space

Patricia I think they look dated but wouldn't bother with them right now if they weren't broken. Pax is out of stock at ikea also I finally I realized being the genius that I am that the doors would open into the room there's not enough room so by pass doors it is.